e-Article
Daratumumab-based regimens for patients with multiple myeloma plus extramedullary plasmacytomas or paraskeletal plasmacytomas: initial follow-up of an Italian multicenter observational clinical experience
Document Type
Original Paper
Author
Mele, Giuseppe; Derudas, Daniele; Conticello, Concetta; Barilà, Gregorio; Gentile, Massimo; Rocco, Stefano; Palmieri, Salvatore; Palazzo, Giulia; Germano, Candida; Reddiconto, Giovanni; Sgherza, Nicola; De Novellis, Danilo; Galeone, Carlotta; Castiglioni, Sara Agavni’; Deiana, Luca; Pascarella, Anna; Martino, Enrica Antonia; Foggetti, Ilaria; Blasi, Ilenia; Spina, Alessandro; Di Renzo, Nicola; Maggi, Alessandro; Tarantini, Giuseppe; Di Raimondo, Francesco; Specchia, Giorgina; Musto, Pellegrino; Pastore, Domenico
Source
Annals of Hematology. :1-11
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0939-5555
1432-0584
1432-0584
Abstract
Myeloma with extramedullary plasmacytomas not adjacent to bone (EMP) is associated with an extremely poor outcome compared with paraosseous plasmacytomas (PP) as current therapeutic approaches are unsatisfactory. The role of new molecules and in particular of monoclonal antibodies is under investigation. To determine whether daratumumab-based regimens are effective for myeloma with EMP, we report herein an initial multicenter observational analysis of 102 myeloma patients with EMP (n = 10) and PP (n = 25) at diagnosis and EMP (n = 28) and PP (n = 39) at relapse, treated with daratumumab-based regimens at 11 Haematological Centers in Italy.EMP and PP at diagnosis were associated with higher biochemical (90% vs. 96%, respectively) and instrumental ORR (86% vs. 83.3%, respectively), while at relapse, biochemical (74% vs. 73%) and instrumental (53% vs. 59%) ORR were lower. Median OS was inferior in EMP patients compared with patients with PP both at diagnosis (21.0 months vs. NR) (p = 0.005) and at relapse (32.0 vs. 40.0 months) (p = 0.428), although, during relapse, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Surprisingly, at diagnosis, median TTP and median TTNT were not reached either in EMP patients or PP patients and during relapse there were no statistically significant differences in terms of median TTP (20 months for two groups), and median TTNT (24 months for PP patients vs. 22 months for EMP patients) between the two groups. Median TTR was 1 month in all populations.These promising results were documented even in the absence of local radiotherapy and in transplant-ineligible patients.