부산대학교 도서관

Assessing joint position sense for rehabilitation after neurological injury provides a prognostic factor in recovery and long-term functional outcomes. A common method for testing joint position sense involves the active replication of a joint configuration presented via a passive movement. However, recent evidence showed how this sense is mediated by the centrally generated signals of motor command, such that movements produced volitionally may be coded differently from passive movements and accuracy may be different when matching targets presented actively. To verify this hypothesis we asked ten participants to actively replicate a target wrist angle with the help of a visual feedback in two conditions, which differed in the mode of target presentation: active (aaJPM) or passive (paJPM). The accuracy of target matching, directional bias and variability were analyzed, as well as speed and smoothness of the matching movement and criterion movement in the aaJPM. Overall results indicate higher accuracy and lower variability in the paJPM, while directional bias showed the tendency to overshoot the target regardless of condition. The speed did not differ in the two conditions and movements were smoother in the aaJPM, suggesting a higher confidence by participants in their matching ability. In conclusion, this study suggests that motor commands negatively affect the accuracy of joint position sense when matching involves the integration of visual and proprioceptive information.