e-Article
Self-report assessment of Positive Appraisal Style (PAS): Development of a process-focused and a content-focused questionnaire for use in mental health and resilience research.
Document Type
Article
Author
Petri-Romão, Papoula; Engen, Haakon; Rupanova, Anna; Puhlmann, Lara; Zerban, Matthias; Neumann, Rebecca J.; Malyshau, Aliaksandr; Ahrens, Kira F.; Schick, Anita; Kollmann, Bianca; Wessa, Michèle; Walker, Henrik; Plichta, Michael M.; Reif, Andreas; Chmitorz, Andrea; Tuescher, Oliver; Basten, Ulrike; Kalisch, Raffael
Source
Subject
*CONFIRMATORY factor analysis
*PSYCHOLOGICAL resilience
*EXPLORATORY factor analysis
*SELF-evaluation
PSYCHIATRIC research
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Positive Appraisal Style Theory of Resilience posits that a person's general style of evaluating stressors plays a central role in mental health and resilience. Specifically, a tendency to appraise stressors positively (positive appraisal style; PAS) is theorized to be protective of mental health and thus a key resilience factor. To this date no measures of PAS exist. Here, we present two scales that measure perceived positive appraisal style, one focusing on cognitive processes that lead to positive appraisals in stressful situations (PASS-process), and the other focusing on the appraisal contents (PASS-content). For PASS-process, the items of the existing questionnaires Brief COPE and CERQ-short were analyzed in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) in independent samples (N = 1157 and N = 1704). The resulting 10-item questionnaire was internally consistent (α =.78, 95% CI [.86,.87]) and showed good convergent and discriminant validity in comparisons with self-report measures of trait optimism, neuroticism, urgency, and spontaneity. For PASS-content, a newly generated item pool of 29 items across stressor appraisal content dimensions (probability, magnitude, and coping potential) were subjected to EFA and CFA in two independent samples (N = 1174 and N = 1611). The resulting 14-item scale showed good internal consistency (α =.87, 95% CI [.86,.87]), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity within the nomological network. The two scales are a new and reliable way to assess self-perceived positive appraisal style in large-scale studies, which could offer key insights into mechanisms of resilience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]