부산대학교 도서관

An investigation was conducted to assess whether an algorithm based on simple clinical information would suffice to classify patients with acute myocardial infarction, with respect to indication for angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor treatment. One hundred consecutive patients with myocardial infarction were prospectively studied. Based on clinical, radiological, electrocardiographic and biochemical information, the patients were classified as having (a) significantly depressed left ventricular function (ejection fraction < or = 40%) justifying treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), (b) preserved ventricular function (ejection fraction > 40%) making ACEI unnecessary, or (c) indeterminate ventricular function, requiring further examination. Using a blinded design, ejection fraction was determined by echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography. A clinical assumption of reduced left ventricular function had a predictive value of an echocardiographically determined ejection fraction < or = 40% of 83% (n = 23). Clinical criteria of good ventricular function had a predictive value of ejection fraction > 40% of 96% (n = 24). In these two groups clinical misclassification occurred in five patients with ejection fraction within the range of 39-45%. Left ventricular function was found to be clinically indeterminate in 53 of the 100 patients. Ejection fraction values assessed by radionuclide ventriculography (n = 44) were on average 9.3%-points lower than echocardiographic values. The indication for ACEI can apparently be determined on the basis of readily available clinical information in approximately 50% of patients with acute myocardial infarction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]