KOR

e-Article

Positron emission tomography using18F-labelled endothelin-1 reveals prevention of binding to cardiac receptors owing to tissue-specific clearance by ETB receptors in vivo.
Document Type
Article
Source
British Journal of Pharmacology. Jan2005, Vol. 144 Issue 1, p115-122. 8p.
Subject
*ENDOTHELINS
*PEPTIDES
*VASOCONSTRICTORS
*CARDIOVASCULAR agents
*POSITRON emission tomography
*PHARMACOLOGY
*MEDICAL sciences
Language
ISSN
0007-1188
Abstract
Our aim was to synthesise an18F analogue of endothelin-1 (ET-1), to dynamically image ET receptors in vivo by positron emission tomography (PET) and to elucidate the function of the ETB subtype as a clearing receptor in organs expressing high densities including kidney and lung.[18F]-ET-1 was characterised in vitro and bound with a single subnanomolar affinity (KD=0.43±0.05?nM, Bmax=27.8±2.1?fmol?mg-1 protein) to human left ventricle (n=4).The in vivo distribution of[18F]-ET-1 in anaesthetised rats was measured using a dedicated small animal PET scanner (microPET) and ex vivo analysis.Dynamic PET data demonstrated that high levels of radioligand accumulated rapidly in the lung, kidney and liver, consistent with receptor binding. The in vivo distribution correlated with the anatomical localisation of receptors detected in vitro using[125I]-ET-1. However, the receptor density visualised in the heart was unexpectedly low compared with that predicted from the in vitro measurements.[18F]-ET-1 binding in lungs could not be displaced by the ETB selective antagonist BQ788, in agreement with the proposed internalisation of ET-1 by ETB receptors. In contrast, infusion of BQ788 prior to injecting[18F]-ET-1 significantly reduce the amount of radioligand visualised in the ETB rich lung and kidney by 85%(P<0.05, n=3) and 55%(P<0.05, n=3), respectively.Under conditions of ETB receptor blockade, the heart could be visualised by microPET imaging.These results suggest that clearance by ETB receptors in the lung and kidney prevents binding of ET-1 to receptors in the heart.British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 144, 115-122. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706064 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]