Catalog
LDR | 05079cam a2200000 a | ||
001 | 0100536091▲ | ||
003 | OCoLC▲ | ||
005 | 20211222112537▲ | ||
007 | ta ▲ | ||
008 | 210212s2021 enka b 001 0 eng c▲ | ||
020 | ▼a0198864965 (hbk.)▲ | ||
020 | ▼a9780198864967 (hbk.)▲ | ||
029 | 1 | ▼aUKMGB▼b020193532▲ | |
035 | ▼a(OCoLC)1237345622▼z(OCoLC)1268276958▲ | ||
040 | ▼aYDX▼beng▼cYDX▼dBDX▼dUKMGB▼dOCLCO▼dOCLCF▼dYDX▼dOCLCO▼dPAU▼d221016▲ | ||
050 | 4 | ▼aQ126.9▼b.P47 2021▲ | |
082 | 0 | 4 | ▼a509▼223▲ |
090 | ▼a509▼bP444s▲ | ||
100 | 1 | ▼aPerillán, José G.▲ | |
245 | 1 | 0 | ▼aScience between myth and history :▼bthe quest for common ground and its importance for scientific practice /▼cJosé G. Perillán ; with a foreword by Trevor Pinch.▲ |
260 | ▼aOxford, UK ;▼aNew York, NY :▼bOxford University Press,▼c2021.▲ | ||
300 | ▼axxiii, 341 p. :▼bill. (some col.) ;▼c23 cm▲ | ||
504 | ▼aIncludes bibliographical references and index.▲ | ||
505 | 0 | 0 | ▼aMachine generated contents note:▼tFriendly Banter --▼tEstablishing Common Ground --▼tUnpacking Einstein's Black Box --▼tMyth-History --▼tRoadmap of Case Studies --▼tEmergent Themes from Myth-Historical Case Studies --▼g1.▼tMyth-Historical Tensions --▼tThe Flying Ashtray Argument --▼tUnpacking Historical Tensions: Who Owns Our Scientific Past? --▼tFinding Interdisciplinary Common Ground --▼tShifting Historiographic Landscapes --▼tMyth-History: Origins of an Interdisciplinary Framework --▼tLeon Lederman's Myth-Historical Filters --▼tLederman's Historiographic Interlude --▼tMyth-History as Chimeric Narrative Category --▼tConclusion --▼g2.▼tMyth-Historical Quantum Erasure --▼tQuantum Omissions --▼tThe Quantum (Mis)education of John S. Bell --▼tQuantum Myth-Histories --▼tEmergence of de Broglie's Pilot Wave Interpretation --▼tFifth Solvay Council -- Converging Lens --▼tForcing Closure of Interpretation Debates --▼tA Rising Pragmatism, Consensus, and Interpretational Lull --▼tCanonizing Quantum Orthodoxy --▼tDe Broglie's Abandonment of Pilot Wave Theory --▼tThe Rhetorical Rise of Impossibility --▼tDavid Bohm Climbs Mt. Impossible --▼tThe Rhetoric of Myth-Historical Responses --▼tConclusion --▼g3.▼tMyth-Historical CRISPR Edits --▼tHeroes and Villains of CRISPR? --▼tCRISPR Basics --▼tProjecting a Miraculous Scientific Ecosystem --▼tAn Image May Be Worth Billions --▼tContested Patent Context --▼tPatent Interference --▼tComplex Patent Landscape --▼tDiluting Doudna and Charpentier --▼tCRISPR Priority Disputes -- Messy and Uneven Publishing Landscapes --▼tLander's Lessons Learned --▼tDoudna Responds --▼tThe Case of Rosalind Franklin --▼tDoudna's Corrective Myth-History --▼tExploring the Power and Impacts of CRISPR-Cas9 --▼tConclusion --▼g4.▼tEchoes of Gravitational Waves --▼tOn the Shoulders of Giants --▼tLIGO Presser --▼tMyth-Historical Interventions --▼tWill the Real Einstein Please Stand Up? --▼tThe Cost of Casting Einstein as a Solitary Genius --▼tEinstein's Unshakable Ambivalence --▼tEarly Explorations into Gravitational Wave Detection --▼tJoseph Weber: Potential Star of Gravitational Wave Theory --▼tBecoming a Gravitational Wave Pariah --▼tPhoenix Rising: Rehabilitated Scientific Hero --▼g5.▼tDemarcating Seismic Uncertainties --▼tGrappling with Uncertainty --▼tWar on Science --▼tUncertain Shockwaves --▼tUncertain Knowledge(s) --▼tA Telling History of Seismic Prediction --▼tBoundary Work: Stigmatized Prediction versus Legitimate Forecasting --▼tMedia Operations: Local Declarations and Distortions --▼tAccused Pseudoscientist Giampaolo Giuliani -- Predicting Earthquakes --▼tPerforming Certainty: Discrediting an "Imbecile" and Anesthetizing the Aquilani --▼tBoundary Work within the L'Aquila Seven -- Refracting Uncertainty --▼tBeyond Scientific Consensus -- Anesthetizing Misinformation --▼tFallout --▼tConclusion --▼tConclusion-Beyond the Wars on Science --▼tThe Flying Ashtray Revisited --▼tReflective Discourse --▼tTransformative Interrogation in Action --▼tFull Disclosure and Transparency Extends to the Past --▼tFinal Reflections on the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic.▲ |
520 | ▼aScience Between Myth and History explores scientific storytelling and its implications on the teaching, practice, and public perception of science. In communicating their science, scientists tend to use historical narratives for important rhetorical purposes. This text explores the implications of doing this.▲ | ||
650 | 0 | ▼aScience▼xHistoriography.▲ | |
650 | 0 | ▼aScience▼xHistory.▲ | |
650 | 0 | ▼aCommunication in science.▲ | |
650 | 0 | ▼aStorytelling.▲ |
Science between myth and history : the quest for common ground and its importance for scientific practice
Document Type
Foreign Book
Title
Science between myth and history : the quest for common ground and its importance for scientific practice / José G. Perillán ; with a foreword by Trevor Pinch.
Author
Publication
Oxford, UK ; New York, NY : Oxford University Press , 2021.
Physical Description
xxiii, 341 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 23 cm
Bibliography Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Formatted Contents Note
Machine generated contents note : Friendly Banter -- Establishing Common Ground -- Unpacking Einstein's Black Box -- Myth-History -- Roadmap of Case Studies -- Emergent Themes from Myth-Historical Case Studies -- 1. Myth-Historical Tensions -- The Flying Ashtray Argument -- Unpacking Historical Tensions: Who Owns Our Scientific Past? -- Finding Interdisciplinary Common Ground -- Shifting Historiographic Landscapes -- Myth-History: Origins of an Interdisciplinary Framework -- Leon Lederman's Myth-Historical Filters -- Lederman's Historiographic Interlude -- Myth-History as Chimeric Narrative Category -- Conclusion -- 2. Myth-Historical Quantum Erasure -- Quantum Omissions -- The Quantum (Mis)education of John S. Bell -- Quantum Myth-Histories -- Emergence of de Broglie's Pilot Wave Interpretation -- Fifth Solvay Council -- Converging Lens -- Forcing Closure of Interpretation Debates -- A Rising Pragmatism, Consensus, and Interpretational Lull -- Canonizing Quantum Orthodoxy -- De Broglie's Abandonment of Pilot Wave Theory -- The Rhetorical Rise of Impossibility -- David Bohm Climbs Mt. Impossible -- The Rhetoric of Myth-Historical Responses -- Conclusion -- 3. Myth-Historical CRISPR Edits -- Heroes and Villains of CRISPR? -- CRISPR Basics -- Projecting a Miraculous Scientific Ecosystem -- An Image May Be Worth Billions -- Contested Patent Context -- Patent Interference -- Complex Patent Landscape -- Diluting Doudna and Charpentier -- CRISPR Priority Disputes -- Messy and Uneven Publishing Landscapes -- Lander's Lessons Learned -- Doudna Responds -- The Case of Rosalind Franklin -- Doudna's Corrective Myth-History -- Exploring the Power and Impacts of CRISPR-Cas9 -- Conclusion -- 4. Echoes of Gravitational Waves -- On the Shoulders of Giants -- LIGO Presser -- Myth-Historical Interventions -- Will the Real Einstein Please Stand Up? -- The Cost of Casting Einstein as a Solitary Genius -- Einstein's Unshakable Ambivalence -- Early Explorations into Gravitational Wave Detection -- Joseph Weber: Potential Star of Gravitational Wave Theory -- Becoming a Gravitational Wave Pariah -- Phoenix Rising: Rehabilitated Scientific Hero -- 5. Demarcating Seismic Uncertainties -- Grappling with Uncertainty -- War on Science -- Uncertain Shockwaves -- Uncertain Knowledge(s) -- A Telling History of Seismic Prediction -- Boundary Work: Stigmatized Prediction versus Legitimate Forecasting -- Media Operations: Local Declarations and Distortions -- Accused Pseudoscientist Giampaolo Giuliani -- Predicting Earthquakes -- Performing Certainty: Discrediting an "Imbecile" and Anesthetizing the Aquilani -- Boundary Work within the L'Aquila Seven -- Refracting Uncertainty -- Beyond Scientific Consensus -- Anesthetizing Misinformation -- Fallout -- Conclusion -- Conclusion-Beyond the Wars on Science -- The Flying Ashtray Revisited -- Reflective Discourse -- Transformative Interrogation in Action -- Full Disclosure and Transparency Extends to the Past -- Final Reflections on the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic.
Summary Note
Science Between Myth and History explores scientific storytelling and its implications on the teaching, practice, and public perception of science. In communicating their science, scientists tend to use historical narratives for important rhetorical purposes. This text explores the implications of doing this.
ISBN
0198864965 (hbk.) 9780198864967 (hbk.)
Call Number
509 P444s
Items
RReservation
AAbsent
VPreservation
CLoan Campus
QRush Cataloging
DDelivery Service
SSMS
PPrint
HHolding Journal DDS
Regist No. | Call number | Item location | Status | Expected return date | Service |
---|
Booktalk
Please feel free to read the book
and write your impressions.
글쓰기
and write your impressions.
Call Sign Browsing
Related Popular Books