학술논문

Repensar la (in)posibilidad del nosotros. Tentativas en torno a los medios de producción de subjetividad
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
Source
TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
Subject
Capitalisme
Capitalismo
Capitalism
Subjectivitat
Subjetividad
Subjectivity
Tecnologia
Tecnología
Technology
Ciències Humanes i Socials
Language
Spanish; Castilian
Abstract
Attending to the fourfold economy of the social reality: force, power, knowledge and subjectivity, this research work addresses concretely how technological mass media, in particular information and communication that dot in the West from the XIX century, and that correspond with a determined articulation of power and knowledge, turn the capitalist social regime, its produced subjectivity and the relationship between them in the field of the relations with forces. Because of a complex programming that captures, organizes and distributes means and modes of producing sensibility the hegemonic subjectivity tends to emerge as a bastion to control the stability and updating subterfuge, from which the knowledge and power system is derived. From outside of itself, it stays in the first line of defence, the most depressed and exposed, to overcome and digest some potential of inherent dissolution by constitution to the social regime of the capitalistic organization. Consummating the outcome that the social body continually sends and technically appropriates and to resend as its own individual, seems its main function between identity and guaranteed depersonalisation by technological mass media directed mainly towards the control of the sensibility and modes of representation. Nevertheless, defusing the power and knowledge system that characterizes the social regime of the capitalistic organization, through a hegemonic subjectivity deactivation practice, is still possible. This provided that the process of subjectivation may relieve the correlation of forces from the constrictions that imposes social organization. The non-captured correlation of forces neither by the power nor knowledge, indeed, displaces the functionality that enervates technology. Moreover, without this turnoff that causes a breach, it would be impossible to maintain an outside and open subjectivity (cross-sectional subjectivity). This precisely articulates a differential field of distances, self-referential, by which technology and subjectivity stay at service of its inherent heterogenicity, a temporal perspective, instead of subjugating to the social organization.