학술논문

The 'Most Ideal' Peter Handke? : Aesthetics and Ethics as Criteria for the Nobel Prize in Literature
Document Type
Source
Journal of World Literature. 9(1):133-148
Subject
literature nobel prize
Peter Handke
aesthetic value and moral flaws
imaginative resistance
Humaniora och konst
Språk och litteratur
Litteraturvetenskap
Humanities
Languages and Literature
General Literature Studies
Language
English
ISSN
2405-6472
Abstract
The Nobel Prize in Literature to the Austrian writer Peter Handke in 2019 gave new attention to one of the basic, and historically highly disputed (cf. Espmark 2001, 2021), questions in relation to the practice of the world’s most important literary prize – on what grounds, aesthetic or otherwise, does the Swedish Academy award the prize? In the aftermath of the 2019 prize to Handke, there was an intense public debate about the aesthetic criteria in relation to ethical criteria, in particular in Swedish national newspapers. Several members of the Academy as well as members of the Nobel Prize committee, wrote articles and gave statements about their individual reasoning for awarding the prize to Handke. Using this debate about the prize awarded to Handke as a case study, I aim to discuss the methodological and theoretical implications connected to the question of which criteria guide the selection of the Nobel Prize in Literature.