학술논문

A comparison of dose and dose-rate conversion factors from the Soviet Union, United Kingdom, US Department of Energy, and the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Fusion Safety Program
Document Type
Technical Report
Author
Source
Other Information: PBD: Dec 1991
Subject
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS
DOSE RATES
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAY
REACTOR SAFETY
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
RADIATION DOSES
FISSION
THERMONUCLEAR REACTIONS
REACTOR ACCIDENTS 700491
FUSION FUEL CYCLE ECONOMICS
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MONITORING AND TRANSPORT
Language
English
ISSN
92012221
Abstract
Several independent data sets of radiological dose and dose-rate conversion factors (DCF/DRCF) have been tabulated or developed by the international community both for fission and fusion safety purposes. This report compares sets from the US Department of Energy, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom with those calculated by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Fusion Safety Program. The objectives were to identify trends and potential outlying values for specific radionuclides and contribute to a future benchmark evaluation of the CARR computer code. Fifty-year committed effective dose equivalent factors were compared for the inhalation and ingestion pathways. External effective dose equivalent rates were compared for the air immersion and ground surface exposure pathways. Comparisons were made by dividing dose factors in the different data bases by the values in the FSP data base. Differences in DCF/DRCF values less than a factor of 2 were considered to be in good agreement and are likely due to the use of slightly different decay data, variations in the number of organs considered for calculating CEDE, and rounding errors. DCF/DRCF values that differed by greater than a factor of 10 were considered to be significant. These differences are attributed primarily to the use of different radionuclide decay data, selection and nomenclature for different isomeric states, treatment of progeny radionuclides, differences in calculational methodology, and assumptions on a radionuclide`s chemical form.