학술논문

„Gekaufte Wirksamkeit?“: Einfluss von Industrie-Sponsoring auf klinische Studien: ”Bought effectiveness?”: influence of industry sponsorship on clinical trials
Document Type
Review Paper
Source
Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde. 41(2):70-73
Subject
evidenz-basierte Zahnmedizin
klinische Studien
Studiendesign
Industrieförderung
Verzerrungspotenzial
evidence-based dentistry
clinical trials
study design
industry-sponsorship
risk of bias
Language
German
ISSN
1614-2217
2190-8036
Abstract
Summary: Industry-sponsorship can impact on the validity of clinical trials. Sponsored trials can differ from nonsponsored trials regarding trial design, findings and reporting, favoring the sponsored products. The effects of industry-sponsorship can also be found for clinical trials in dentistry. For trials investigating the caries preventive effectiveness of fluoride gels or varnishes, an impact of sponsorship on trial findings and year of publication seems possible: Older trials, which found a high effectiveness of fluoride, were often sponsored, whereas more recent trials which found a lower effectiveness, were not sponsored. Trials on newly developed and marketed fluo - ride-free caries-preventive agents might also be prone to sponsorship bias. Dentists and consumers should critically evaluate presumably evidence-based claims before using specific products in their daily practice.

Online Access