학술논문
Characterization of two transcriptomic subtypes of marker-null large cell carcinoma of the lung suggests different origin and potential new therapeutic perspectives
Document Type
Original Paper
Author
Simbolo, Michele; Centonze, Giovanni; Gkountakos, Anastasios; Monti, Valentina; Maisonneuve, Patrick; Golovco, Stela; Sabella, Giovanna; Del Gobbo, Alessandro; Gobbo, Stefano; Ferrero, Stefano; Fabbri, Alessandra; Pardo, Carlotta; Garzone, Giovanna; Prinzi, Natalie; Pusceddu, Sara; Testi, Adele; Rolli, Luigi; Mangogna, Alessandro; Bercich, Luisa; Benvenuti, Mauro Roberto; Bria, Emilio; Pilotto, Sara; Berruti, Alfredo; Pastorino, Ugo; Capella, Carlo; Infante, Maurizio; Milella, Michele; Scarpa, Aldo; Milione, Massimo
Source
Virchows Archiv: European Journal of Pathology. :1-12
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0945-6317
1432-2307
1432-2307
Abstract
Pulmonary large cell carcinoma (LCC) is an undifferentiated neoplasm lacking morphological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical features of small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma (ADC), or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The available molecular information on this rare disease is limited. This study aimed to provide an integrated molecular overview of 16 cases evaluating the mutational asset of 409 genes and the transcriptomic profiles of 20,815 genes. Our data showed that TP53 was the most frequently inactivated gene (15/16; 93.7%) followed by RB1 (5/16; 31.3%) and KEAP1 (4/16; 25%), while CRKL and MYB genes were each amplified in 4/16 (25%) cases and MYC in 3/16 (18.8%) cases; transcriptomic analysis identified two molecular subtypes including a Pure-LCC and an adenocarcinoma like-LCC (ADLike-LCC) characterized by different activated pathways and cell of origin. In the Pure-LCC group, POU2F3 and FOXI1 were distinctive overexpressed markers. A tuft cell-like profile and the enrichment of a replication stress signature, particularly involving ATR, was related to this profile. Differently, the ADLike-LCC were characterized by an alveolar-cell transcriptomic profile and association with AIM2 inflammasome complex signature. In conclusion, our study split the histological marker-null LCC into two different transcriptomic entities, with POU2F3, FOXI1, and AIM2 genes as differential expression markers that might be probed by immunohistochemistry for the differential diagnosis between Pure-LCC and ADLike-LCC. Finally, the identification of several signatures linked to replication stress in Pure-LCC and inflammasome complex in ADLike-LCC could be useful for designing new potential therapeutic approaches for these subtypes.