학술논문
Development of a comprehensive assessment tool to measure the quality of care for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries
Document Type
Original Paper
Author
Ghodsi, Zahra; Jazayeri, Seyed Behnam; Pourrashidi, Ahmad; Sadeghi-Naeini, Mohsen; Azadmanjir, Zahra; Baigi, Vali; Maroufi, Seyed Farzad; Azarhomayoun, Amir; Faghih-Jouybari, Morteza; Amirjamshidi, Abbas; Naghdi, Khatereh; Habibi Arejan, Roya; Shabani, Maryam; Sepahdoost, Arvin; Dehghanbanadaki, Hojat; Habibi, Reza; Mohammadzadeh, Mahdi; Bahreini, Maryam; O’Reilly, Gerard Michael; Vaccaro, Alexander R.; Harrop, James S.; Davies, Benjamin M.; Yi, Lu; Ghodsi, Seyed Mohammad; Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
Source
Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 9(1)
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2058-6124
Abstract
Objective: To develop a comprehensive assessment tool to evaluate the Quality of Care (QoC) in managing individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCI).Method: At first, the concepts of QoC for TSCI were identified by conducting a qualitative interview along with re-evaluation of the results of a published scoping review (conceptualization). After operationalization of indicators, they were valued by using the expert panel method. Afterward, the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated and served as cut-offs for indicator selection. Then specific questions were developed for each indicator and classified into three categories: pre-hospital, in-hospital, and post-hospital. Data availability of the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) was subsequently used to design questions that represent indicators in an assessment tool format. The comprehensiveness of the tool was evaluated using a 4-item Likert scale by the expert panel.Result: Twelve experts participated in conceptualization and 11 experts participated in operationalization phase. Overall, 94 concepts for QoC were identified from published scoping review (87 items) and qualitative interviews (7 items). The process of operationalization and indicator selection led to the development of 27 indicators with acceptable content validity. Finally, the assessment tool contained three pre-hospital, twelve in-hospital, nine post-hospital, and three mixed indicators. Ninety-one percent of experts evaluated the entire tool as comprehensive.Conclusion: Our study presents a health-related QoC tool that contains a comprehensive set of indicators to assess the QoC for individuals with TSCI. However, this tool should be used in various situations to establish construct validity further.