학술논문

Grade V renal trauma management: results from the multi-institutional genito-urinary trauma study.
Document Type
article
Source
World journal of urology. 41(7)
Subject
Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study Group
Urogenital System
Kidney
Humans
Multiple Trauma
Nephrectomy
Injury Severity Score
Retrospective Studies
Adult
Middle Aged
Trauma Centers
Kidney trauma
Nonoperative management
Urologic trauma
Kidney Disease
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Patient Safety
6.4 Surgery
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Clinical Sciences
Urology & Nephrology
Language
Abstract
PurposeTo investigate management trends for American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade V renal trauma with focus on non-operative management.MethodsWe used prospectively collected data as part of the Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study (MiGUTS). We included patients with grade V renal trauma according to the AAST Injury Scoring Scale 2018 update. All cases submitted by participating centers with radiology images available were independently reviewed to confirm renal trauma grade. Management was classified as expectant, conservative (minimally invasive, endoscopic or percutaneous procedures), or operative (renal-related surgery).ResultsEighty patients were included, 25 of whom had complete imaging and had independent confirmation of AAST grade V renal trauma. Median age was 35 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 25-50) and 23 (92%) had blunt trauma. Ten patients (40%) were managed operatively with nephrectomy. Conservative management was used in nine patients (36%) of which six received angioembolization and three had a stent or drainage tube placed. Expectant management was followed in six (24%) patients. Transfusion requirements were progressively higher with groups requiring more aggressive treatment, and injury characteristics differed significantly across management groups in terms of hematoma size and laceration size. Vascular contrast extravasation was more likely in operatively managed patients though a statistically significant association was not found.ConclusionSuccessful use of nonoperative management for grade V injuries is used for a substantial subset of patients. Lower transfusion requirement and less severe injury radiologic phenotype appear to be important characteristics delineating this group.