학술논문

Effects of ivermectin treatment of backyard chickens on mosquito dynamics and West Nile virus transmission
Document Type
article
Source
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 16(3)
Subject
Biological Sciences
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Health Sciences
Vaccine Related
Rare Diseases
Vector-Borne Diseases
Emerging Infectious Diseases
West Nile Virus
Infectious Diseases
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Prevention of disease and conditions
and promotion of well-being
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment
Aetiology
3.2 Interventions to alter physical and biological environmental risks
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Animals
Chickens
Culex
Culicidae
Ivermectin
Mosquito Vectors
West Nile Fever
West Nile virus
Medical and Health Sciences
Tropical Medicine
Biological sciences
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
BackgroundVector control strategies typically rely on pesticides to target mosquitoes involved in enzootic and zoonotic transmission of West Nile virus (WNV). Nevertheless, increasing insecticide resistance and a desire to reduce pesticide usage provide the impetus for developing alternative strategies. Ivermectin (IVM), an antiparasitic drug which is widely used in human and veterinary medicine, is a potential alternative for targeted control because Culex mosquitoes experience increased mortality following ingestion of IVM in bloodmeals.Methodology/principal findingsWe conducted a randomized field trial to investigate the impact of treating backyard chicken flocks with IVM in urban neighborhoods across Davis, California on mosquito populations and WNV transmission dynamics. We observed a significant reduction in WNV seroconversions in treated vs. untreated chickens, suggesting a reduction in WNV transmission intensity around treated flocks. We also detected a reduction in parity rates of Cx. tarsalis near treated vs. untreated flocks and increased mortality in wild mosquitoes following a bloodmeal on treated chickens (IVM serum concentration > 5ng/mL) vs. chickens with IVM serum concentrations < 5 ng/mL. However, we did not find a significant difference in abundance or infection prevalence in mosquitoes between treatment groups associated with the reductions in seroconversions. Mosquito immigration from surrounding larval habitat, relatively low WNV activity in the study area, and variable IVM serum concentrations likely contributed to uncertainty about the impact.Conclusions/significanceTaken together, our results point to a reduction in WNV transmission due to the impact of IVM on Culex mosquito populations and support the ongoing investigation of oral administration of IVM to wild birds for local control of WNV transmission, although further work is needed to optimize dosing and understand effects on entomological endpoints.