학술논문

Movement between facilities for HIV care among a mobile population in Kenya: transfer, loss to follow-up, and reengagement
Document Type
article
Source
AIDS Care. 28(11)
Subject
Clinical and Health Psychology
Health Sciences
Public Health
Human Society
Psychology
Sociology
HIV/AIDS
Clinical Research
Infectious Diseases
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Adult
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Anti-HIV Agents
Female
Follow-Up Studies
HIV Infections
Humans
Incidence
Kenya
Lost to Follow-Up
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Transfer
Proportional Hazards Models
Transients and Migrants
HIV
transfer
lost to follow-up
stigma
resource-limited setting
Public Health and Health Services
Public health
Clinical and health psychology
Language
Abstract
HIV treatment is life-long, yet many patients travel or migrate for their livelihoods, risking treatment interruption. We examine timely reengagement in care among patients who transferred-out or were lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) from a rural HIV facility. We conducted a cohort study among 369 adult patients on antiretroviral therapy between November 2011 and November 2013 on Mfangano Island, Kenya. Patients who transferred or were LTFU (i.e., missed a scheduled appointment by ≥90 days) were traced to determine if they reengaged or accessed care at another clinic. We report cumulative incidence and time to reengagement using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Among 369 patients at the clinic, 23(6%) requested an official transfer and 78(21%) were LTFU. Among official transfers, cumulative incidence of linkage to their destination facility was 91% at three months (95%CI (confidence intervals) 69-98%). Among LTFU, cumulative incidence of reengagement in care at the original or a new clinic was 14% at three months (95%CI 7-23%) and 60% at six months (95%CI 48-69%). In the adjusted Cox model, patients who left with an official transfer reengaged in care six times faster than those who did not (adjusted hazard ratio 6.2, 95%CI 3.4-11.0). Patients who left an island-based HIV clinic in Kenya with an official transfer letter reengaged in care faster than those who were LTFU, although many in both groups had treatment gaps long enough to risk viral rebound. Better coordination of transfers between clinics, such as assisting patients with navigating the process or improving inter-clinic communication surrounding transfers, may reduce delays in treatment during transfer and improve overall clinical outcomes.