학술논문

Efficacy and safety of memantine in children with autism spectrum disorder: Results from three phase 2 multicenter studies
Document Type
article
Source
Autism. 23(8)
Subject
Biological Psychology
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Psychology
Clinical Research
Neurosciences
Brain Disorders
Autism
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Mental Health
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Child
Delayed-Action Preparations
Double-Blind Method
Early Termination of Clinical Trials
Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
Female
Fever
Headache
Humans
Irritable Mood
Male
Memantine
Nasopharyngitis
Social Behavior
Treatment Outcome
Asperger's disorder
autism spectrum disorders
clinical trial
medication
memantine
pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified
randomized withdrawal
school-age children
Social Responsiveness Scale
Asperger’s disorder
Specialist Studies in Education
Cognitive Sciences
Developmental & Child Psychology
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
Three phase 2 trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and long-term safety of weight-based memantine extended release (ER) treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder. MEM-MD-91, a 50-week open-label trial, identified memantine extended-release treatment responders for enrollment into MEM-MD-68, a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial. MEM-MD-69 was an open-label extension trial in which participants from MEM-MD-68, MEM-MD-91, and open-label trial MEM-MD-67 were treated ⩽48 weeks with memantine extended release. In MEM-MD-91, 517 (59.6%) participants were confirmed Social Responsiveness Scale responders at week 12; mean Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores improved two to three times a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. In MEM-MD-68, there was no difference between memantine and placebo on the primary efficacy parameter, the proportion of patients with a loss of therapeutic response (defined as ⩾10-point increase from baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score). MEM-MD-69 exploratory analyses revealed mean standard deviation improvement in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score of 32.4 (26.4) from baseline of the first lead-in study. No new safety concerns were evident. While the a priori-defined efficacy results of the double-blind trial were not achieved, the considerable improvements in mean Social Responsiveness Scale scores from baseline in the open-label trials were presumed to be clinically important.