학술논문

Comparing the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale as Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Neurotrauma. 38(23)
Subject
Pediatric
Traumatic Head and Spine Injury
Clinical Research
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Neurosciences
Brain Disorders
Childhood Injury
Injuries and accidents
Adult
Brain Injuries
Traumatic
Female
Humans
Male
Outcome Assessment
Health Care
Patient Acuity
Personal Satisfaction
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
common data elements
friend controls
Glasgow Coma Scale
health related quality of life
orthopedic trauma controls
Quality of Life after Brain Injury Overall Score
Satisfaction with Life Survey
traumatic brain injury
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Investigators
Clinical Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Language
Abstract
It is important to measure quality of life (QoL) after traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet limited studies have compared QoL inventories. In 2579 TBI patients, orthopedic trauma controls, and healthy friend control participants, we compared the Quality of Life After Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS), developed for TBI patients, to the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), an index of generic life satisfaction. We tested the hypothesis that group differences (TBI and orthopedic trauma vs. healthy friend controls) would be larger for the QOLIBRI-OS than the SWLS and that the QOLIBRI-OS would manifest more substantial changes over time in the injured groups, demonstrating more relevance of the QOLIBRI-OS to traumatic injury recovery. (1) We compared the group differences (TBI vs. orthopedic trauma control vs. friend control) in QoL as indexed by the SWLS versus the QOLIBRI-OS and (2) characterized changes across time in these two inventories across 1 year in these three groups. Our secondary objective was to characterize the relationship between TBI severity and QoL. As compared with healthy friend controls, the QOLIBRI reflected greater reductions in QoL than the SWLS for both the TBI group (all time points) and the orthopedic trauma control group (2 weeks and 3 months). The QOLIBRI-OS better captured expected improvements in QoL during the injury recovery course in injured groups than the SWLS, which demonstrated smaller changes over time. TBI severity was not consistently or robustly associated with self-reported QoL. The findings imply that, as compared with the SWLS, the QOLIBRI-OS appears to identify QoL issues more specifically relevant to traumatically injured patients and may be a more appropriate primary QoL outcome measure for research focused on the sequelae of traumatic injuries.