학술논문
An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) prospective multi-center research protocol: outcomes of urethral realignment versus suprapubic cystostomy after pelvic fracture urethral injury
Document Type
article
Author
Moses, Rachel A; Selph, John Patrick; Voelzke, Bryan B; Piotrowski, Joshua; Eswara, Jairam R; Erickson, Bradley A; Gupta, Shubham; Dmochowski, Roger R; Johnsen, Niels V; Shridharani, Anand; Blaschko, Sarah D; Elliott, Sean P; Schwartz, Ian; Harris, Catherine R; Borawski, Kristy; Figler, Bradley D; Osterberg, E Charles; Burks, Frank N; Bihrle, William; Miller, Brandi; Santucci, Richard A; Breyer, Benjamin N; Flynn, Brian; Higuchi, Ty; Kim, Fernando J; Broghammer, Joshua A; Presson, Angela P; Myers, Jeremy B
Source
Translational Andrology and Urology. 7(4)
Subject
Language
Abstract
BackgroundPelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) occur in up to 10% of pelvic fractures. It remains controversial whether initial primary urethral realignment (PR) after PFUI decreases the incidence of urethral obstruction and the need for subsequent urethral procedures. We present methodology for a prospective cohort study analyzing the outcomes of PR versus suprapubic cystostomy tube (SPT) after PFUI.MethodsA prospective cohort trial was designed to compare outcomes between PR (group 1) and SPT placement (group 2). Centers are assigned to a group upon entry into the study. All patients will undergo retrograde attempted catheter placement; if this fails a cystoscopy exam is done to confirm a complete urethral disruption and attempt at gentle retrograde catheter placement. If catheter placement fails, group 1 will undergo urethral realignment and group 2 will undergo SPT. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of urethral obstruction preventing atraumatic passage of a flexible cystoscope. Secondary outcome measures include: subsequent urethral interventions, post-injury complications, urethroplasty complexity, erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence rates.ResultsPrior studies demonstrate PR is associated with a 15% to 50% reduction in urethral obstruction. Ninety-six men (48 per treatment group) are required to detect a 15% treatment effect (80% power, 0.05 significance level, 20% loss to follow up/death rate). Busy trauma centers treat complete PFUI approximately 1-6 times per year, thus our goal is to recruit 25 trauma centers and enroll patients for 3 years with a goal of 100 or more total patients with complete urethral disruption.ConclusionsThe proposed prospective multi-institutional cohort study should determine the utility of acute urethral realignment after PFUI.