학술논문

Activin and TGFβ use diverging mitogenic signaling in advanced colon cancer
Document Type
article
Source
Molecular Cancer. 14(1)
Subject
Biochemistry and Cell Biology
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Biological Sciences
Genetics
Cancer
Digestive Diseases
Colo-Rectal Cancer
Aetiology
2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Activin Receptors
Type II
Activins
Animals
Blotting
Western
Cell Line
Tumor
Colonic Neoplasms
Immunohistochemistry
Immunoprecipitation
In Vitro Techniques
Mice
Mice
Knockout
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
Receptors
Transforming Growth Factor beta
Colon cancer
Activin
TGF beta
PI3K
Mitogenic signaling
p21
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Biochemistry and cell biology
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding cell signaling pathways that contribute to metastatic colon cancer is critical to risk stratification in the era of personalized therapeutics. Here, we dissect the unique involvement of mitogenic pathways in a TGFβ or activin-induced metastatic phenotype of colon cancer.MethodMitogenic signaling/growth factor receptor status and p21 localization were correlated in primary colon cancers and intestinal tumors from either AOM/DSS treated ACVR2A (activin receptor 2) -/- or wild type mice. Colon cancer cell lines (+/- SMAD4) were interrogated for ligand-induced PI3K and MEK/ERK pathway activation and downstream protein/phospho-isoform expression/association after knockdown and pharmacologic inhibition of pathway members. EMT was assessed using epithelial/mesenchymal markers and migration assays.ResultsIn primary colon cancers, loss of nuclear p21 correlated with upstream activation of activin/PI3K while nuclear p21 expression was associated with TGFβ/MEK/ERK pathway activation. Activin, but not TGFβ, led to PI3K activation via interaction of ACVR1B and p85 independent of SMAD4, resulting in p21 downregulation. In contrast, TGFβ increased p21 via MEK/ERK pathway through a SMAD4-dependent mechanism. While activin induced EMT via PI3K, TGFβ induced EMT via MEK/ERK activation. In vivo, loss of ACVR2A resulted in loss of pAkt, consistent with activin-dependent PI3K signaling.ConclusionAlthough activin and TGFβ share growth suppressive SMAD signaling in colon cancer, they diverge in their SMAD4-independent pro-migratory signaling utilizing distinct mitogenic signaling pathways that affect EMT. p21 localization in colon cancer may determine a dominant activin versus TGFβ ligand signaling phenotype warranting further validation as a therapeutic biomarker prior to targeting TGFβ family receptors.