학술논문

Peritoneal Dialysis Use and Practice Patterns: An International Survey Study
Document Type
article
Source
American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 77(3)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Research
Kidney Disease
Aging
Health Services
Administrative Personnel
Cost Sharing
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery of Health Care
Developed Countries
Developing Countries
Health Expenditures
Health Policy
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Internationality
Kidney Failure
Chronic
Nephrologists
Nephrology
Outcome Assessment
Health Care
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Peritoneal Dialysis
Physicians
Practice Patterns
Physicians'
Quality of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Epidemiology
RRT modality
access to health care
affordability of health care
end-stage renal disease
global survey
health care delivery
health care disparities
health policy
home dialysis
international differences
kidney failure
peritoneal dialysis
renal replacement therapy
Public Health and Health Services
Urology & Nephrology
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
Rationale & objectiveApproximately 11% of people with kidney failure worldwide are treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study examined PD use and practice patterns across the globe.Study designA cross-sectional survey.Setting & participantsStakeholders including clinicians, policy makers, and patient representatives in 182 countries convened by the International Society of Nephrology between July and September 2018.OutcomesPD use, availability, accessibility, affordability, delivery, and reporting of quality outcome measures.Analytical approachDescriptive statistics.ResultsResponses were received from 88% (n=160) of countries and there were 313 participants (257 nephrologists [82%], 22 non-nephrologist physicians [7%], 6 other health professionals [2%], 17 administrators/policy makers/civil servants [5%], and 11 others [4%]). 85% (n=156) of countries responded to questions about PD. Median PD use was 38.1 per million population. PD was not available in 30 of the 156 (19%) countries responding to PD-related questions, particularly in countries in Africa (20/41) and low-income countries (15/22). In 69% of countries, PD was the initial dialysis modality for≤10% of patients with newly diagnosed kidney failure. Patients receiving PD were expected to pay 1% to 25% of treatment costs, and higher (>75%) copayments (out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients) were more common in South Asia and low-income countries. Average exchange volumes were adequate (defined as 3-4 exchanges per day or the equivalent for automated PD) in 72% of countries. PD quality outcome monitoring and reporting were variable. Most countries did not measure patient-reported PD outcomes.LimitationsLow responses from policy makers; limited ability to provide more in-depth explanations underpinning outcomes from each country due to lack of granular data; lack of objective data.ConclusionsLarge inter- and intraregional disparities exist in PD availability, accessibility, affordability, delivery, and reporting of quality outcome measures around the world, with the greatest gaps observed in Africa and South Asia.