학술논문

Statistical Guidelines for Handling Missing Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Research
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Neurotrauma. 38(18)
Subject
Traumatic Head and Spine Injury
Neurosciences
Brain Disorders
Clinical Research
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Neurological
Injuries and accidents
Good Health and Well Being
Brain Injuries
Traumatic
Child
Data Interpretation
Statistical
Databases
Factual
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
assessment tools
missing data
statistical guidelines
TBI
TRACK-TBI Investigators
Clinical Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Language
Abstract
Missing data is a persistent and unavoidable problem in even the most carefully designed traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical research. Missing data patterns may result from participant dropout, non-compliance, technical issues, or even death. This review describes the types of missing data that are common in TBI research, and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the statistical approaches used to draw conclusions and make clinical decisions from these data. We review recent innovations in missing values analysis (MVA), a relatively new branch of statistics, as applied to clinical TBI data. Our discussion focuses on studies from the International Traumatic Brain Injury Research (InTBIR) initiative project: Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI), Collaborative Research on Acute TBI in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe (CREACTIVE), and Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial (ADAPT). In addition, using data from the TRACK-TBI pilot study (n = 586) and the completed clinical trial assessing valproate (VPA) for the treatment of post-traumatic epilepsy (n = 379) we present real-world examples of typical missing data patterns and the application of statistical techniques to mitigate the impact of missing data in order to draw sound conclusions from ongoing clinical studies.