학술논문

Clinical and Radiographic Factors Associated With Failed Renal Angioembolization: Results From the Multi-institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study (Mi-GUTS)
Document Type
article
Source
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Research
Kidney Disease
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Renal and urogenital
Adult
Angiography
Embolization
Therapeutic
Female
Humans
Kidney
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Treatment Failure
Wounds
Nonpenetrating
Wounds
Penetrating
Young Adult
Urology & Nephrology
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo find clinical or radiographic factors that are associated with angioembolization failure after high-grade renal trauma.Material and methodsPatients were selected from the Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study. Included were patients who initially received renal angioembolization after high-grade renal trauma (AAST grades III-V). This cohort was dichotomized into successful or failed angioembolization. Angioembolization was considered a failure if angioembolization was followed by repeat angiography and/or an exploratory laparotomy.ResultsA total of 67 patients underwent management initially with angioembolization, with failure in 18 (27%) patients. Those with failed angioembolization had a larger proportion ofgrade IV (72% vs 53%) and grade V (22% vs 12%) renal injuries. A total of 53 patients underwent renal angioembolization and had initial radiographic data for review, with failure in 13 cases. The failed renal angioembolization group had larger perirenal hematoma sizes on the initial trauma scan.ConclusionAngioembolization after high-grade renal trauma failed in 27% of patients. Failed angioembolization was associated with higher injury grade and a larger perirenal hematoma. Likely these characteristics are associated with high-grade renal trauma that may be less amenable to successful treatment after a single renal angioembolization.