학술논문

Gene expression profiling identifies responsive patients with cancer of unknown primary treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and everolimus: NCCTG N0871 (alliance) †
Document Type
article
Source
Annals of Oncology. 27(2)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Genetics
Cancer
Clinical Research
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Carboplatin
Disease-Free Survival
Everolimus
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Unknown Primary
Paclitaxel
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Digestive Diseases
Rare Diseases
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Adenocarcinoma
Antibodies
Monoclonal
Antibodies
Monoclonal
Humanized
Double-Blind Method
Esophageal Neoplasms
Esophagogastric Junction
Fluorouracil
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leucovorin
Organoplatinum Compounds
Stomach Neoplasms
gastroesophageal junction
gastric cancer
esophageal cancer
ramucirumab
vascular endothelial growth factor
cancer of unknown primary
everolimus
expression profile
platinum chemotherapy
taxane chemotherapy
tissue of origin
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
BackgroundCarboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) are standard treatments for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, exhibits activity in diverse cancer types. We did a phase II trial combining everolimus with CP for CUP. We also evaluated whether a gene expression profiling (GEP) test that predicts tissue of origin (TOO) could identify responsive patients.Patients and methodsA tumor biopsy was required for central confirmation of CUP and GEP. Patients with metastatic, untreated CUP received everolimus (30 mg weekly) with P (200 mg/m(2)) and C (area under the curve 6) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was response rate (RR), with 22% needed for success. The GEP test categorized patients into two groups: those having a TOO where CP is versus is not considered standard therapy.ResultsOf 45 assessable patients, the RR was 36% (95% confidence interval 22% to 51%), which met criteria for success. Grade ≥3 toxicities were predominantly hematologic (80%). Adequate tissue for GEP was available in 38 patients and predicted 10 different TOOs. Patients with a TOO where platinum/taxane is a standard (n = 19) tended to have higher RR (53% versus 26%) and significantly longer PFS (6.4 versus 3.5 months) and OS (17.8 versus 8.3 months, P = 0.005), compared with patients (n = 19) with a TOO where platinum/taxane is not standard.ConclusionsEverolimus combined with CP demonstrated promising antitumor activity and an acceptable side-effect profile. A tumor biomarker identifying TOO may be useful to select CUP patients for specific antitumor regimens.ClinicaltrialsgovNCT00936702.