학술논문

Evidence-based and guideline-concurrent responses to narratives deferring HCV treatment among people who inject drugs
Document Type
article
Source
Harm Reduction Journal. 16(1)
Subject
Health Services and Systems
Health Sciences
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis
HIV/AIDS
Drug Abuse (NIDA only)
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Hepatitis
Hepatitis - C
Liver Disease
Substance Misuse
Behavioral and Social Science
Infectious Diseases
Digestive Diseases
Health Services
Clinical Research
Health and social care services research
8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Adult
Drug Users
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Guidelines as Topic
HIV Infections
Harm Reduction
Health Knowledge
Attitudes
Practice
Health Services Accessibility
Hepatitis C
Humans
Insurance
Health
Male
Middle Aged
Narration
Socioeconomic Factors
Substance Abuse
Intravenous
Time-to-Treatment
Young Adult
HCV infections
Substance abuse
Intravenous
Risk factors
Public Health and Health Services
Substance Abuse
Health services and systems
Public health
Language
Abstract
BackgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is increasingly prevalent among people who inject drugs (PWID) in the context of the current US opioid crisis. Although curative therapy is available and recommended as a public health strategy, few PWID have been treated. We explore PWID narratives that explain why they have not sought HCV treatment or decided against starting it. We then compare these narratives to evidence-based and guideline-concordant information to better enable health, social service, harm reduction providers, PWID, and other stakeholders to dispel misconceptions and improve HCV treatment uptake in this vulnerable population.MethodsWe recruited HIV-uninfected PWID (n = 33) through community-based organizations (CBOs) to participate in semi-structured, in-depth qualitative interviews on topics related to overall health, access to care, and knowledge and interest in specific HIV prevention methods.ResultsIn interviews, HCV transmission and delaying or forgoing HCV treatment emerged as important themes. We identified three predominant narratives relating to delaying or deferring HCV treatment among PWID: (1) lacking concern about HCV being serious or urgent enough to require treatment, (2) recognizing the importance of treatment but nevertheless deciding to delay treatment, and (3) perceiving that clinicians and insurance companies recommend that patients who currently use or inject drugs should delay treatment.ConclusionsOur findings highlight persistent beliefs among PWID that hinder HCV treatment utilization. Given the strong evidence that treatment improves individual health regardless of substance use status while also decreasing HCV transmission in the population, efforts are urgently needed to counter the predominant narratives identified in our study. We provide evidence-based, guideline-adherent information that counters the identified narratives in order to help individuals working with PWID to motivate and facilitate treatment access and uptake. An important strategy to improve HCV treatment initiation among PWID could involve disseminating guideline-concordant counternarratives to PWID and the providers who work with and are trusted by this population.