학술논문

Provision of long‐acting reversible contraception in HIV‐prevalent countries: results from nationally representative surveys in southern Africa
Document Type
article
Source
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 120(11)
Subject
Adolescent Sexual Activity
Teenage Pregnancy
Contraception/Reproduction
Clinical Research
HIV/AIDS
Patient Safety
Behavioral and Social Science
Infectious Diseases
Pediatric
Prevention
Infection
Reproductive health and childbirth
Good Health and Well Being
Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence
Contraceptive Devices
Female
Female
Guideline Adherence
HIV Infections
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Needs Assessment
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns
Nurses'
Practice Patterns
Physicians'
Rural Health Services
South Africa
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urban Health Services
Young Adult
Zimbabwe
HIV
implantable contraception
intrauterine device
long-acting reversible contraception
Medical and Health Sciences
Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo analyse the current provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and clinician training needs in HIV-prevalent settings.DesignNationally representative survey of clinicians.SettingHIV-prevalent settings in South Africa and Zimbabwe.PopulationClinicians in South Africa and Zimbabwe.MethodsNationally representative surveys of clinicians were conducted in South Africa and Zimbabwe (n = 1444) to assess current clinical practice in the provision of LARC in HIV-prevalent settings. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse contraceptive provision and clinician training needs.Main outcome measureMultivariable logistic regression of contraceptive provision and clinician training needs.ResultsProvision of the most effective reversible contraceptives is limited: only 14% of clinicians provide copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), 4% levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs and 16% contraceptive implants. Clinicians' perceptions of patient eligibility for IUD use were overly restrictive, especially related to HIV risks. Less than 5% reported that IUDs were appropriate for women at high risk of HIV or for HIV-positive women, contrary to evidence-based guidelines. Only 15% viewed implants as appropriate for women at risk of HIV. Most clinicians (82%), however, felt that IUDs were underused by patients, and over half desired additional training on LARC methods. Logistic regression analysis showed that LARC provision was largely restricted to physicians, hospital settings and urban areas. Results also showed that clinicians in rural areas and clinics, including nurses, were especially interested in training.ConclusionsClinician competency in LARC provision is important in southern Africa, given the low use of methods and high rates of unintended pregnancy among HIV-positive and at-risk women. Despite low provision, clinician interest is high, suggesting the need for increased evidence-based training in LARC to reduce unintended pregnancy and associated morbidities.