학술논문

Environmental contamination in the isolation rooms of COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation or high-flow oxygen therapy
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Hospital Infection. 106(3)
Subject
Medical Microbiology
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Lung
Pneumonia & Influenza
Infectious Diseases
Pneumonia
Vaccine Related
Biodefense
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Prevention
Clinical Research
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Air Microbiology
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
Decontamination
Environmental Pollution
Humans
Hyperbaric Oxygenation
Pandemics
Patients' Rooms
Pneumonia
Viral
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Respiration
Artificial
SARS-CoV-2
Environmental contamination
Severe pneumonia
Public Health and Health Services
Epidemiology
Clinical sciences
Public health
Language
Abstract
BackgroundIdentifying the extent of environmental contamination of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential for infection control and prevention. The extent of environmental contamination has not been fully investigated in the context of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients.AimTo investigate environmental SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the isolation rooms of severe COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation or high-flow oxygen therapy.MethodsEnvironmental swab samples and air samples were collected from the isolation rooms of three COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia. Patients 1 and 2 received mechanical ventilation with a closed suction system, while patient 3 received high-flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was used to detect SARS-CoV-2; viral cultures were performed for samples not negative on rRT-PCR.FindingsOf the 48 swab samples collected in the rooms of patients 1 and 2, only samples from the outside surfaces of the endotracheal tubes tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR. However, in patient 3's room, 13 of the 28 environmental samples (fomites, fixed structures, and ventilation exit on the ceiling) showed positive results. Air samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Viable viruses were identified on the surface of the endotracheal tube of patient 1 and seven sites in patient 3's room.ConclusionEnvironmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 may be a route of viral transmission. However, it might be minimized when patients receive mechanical ventilation with a closed suction system. These findings can provide evidence for guidelines for the safe use of personal protective equipment.