학술논문

Beverage Advertisement Receptivity Associated With Sugary Drink Intake and Harm Perceptions Among California Adolescents
Document Type
article
Source
American Journal of Health Promotion. 35(4)
Subject
Public Health
Health Sciences
Clinical Research
Pediatric
Adolescent
Advertising
Beverages
California
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Perception
Sugars
Sweetening Agents
adolescent health
sugar-sweetened beverages
marketing
risk perceptions
nutrition
health behaviors
Human Movement and Sports Sciences
Public Health and Health Services
Curriculum and Pedagogy
Public health
Language
Abstract
PurposeEvaluate associations of adolescents' beverage marketing receptivity with sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) perceived harm and intake.DesignSchool-based cross-sectional health behavior survey.SettingSeven rural schools in California, 2019-2020.Subjects815 student participants in grades 9 or 10.MeasuresParticipants viewed 6 beverage advertisement images with brand obscured, randomly selected from a larger pool. Ads for telecommunications products were an internal control. Receptivity was a composite of recognizing, liking, and identifying the displayed brand (later categorized: low, moderate, high). Weekly SSB servings were measured with a quantitative food frequency questionnaire and perceived SSB harm as 4 levels ("no harm" to "a lot").AnalysisOutcomes SSB intake (binomial regression) and perceived harm (ordered logistic regression) were modeled according to advertisement receptivity (independent variable), with multiple imputation, school-level clustering, and adjustment for presumed confounders (gender, age, screen time, etc.).ResultsIn covariable-adjusted models, greater beverage advertisement receptivity independently predicted higher SSB intake (ratio of SSB servings, high vs. low receptivity: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.15, 1.89]) and lower perceived SSB harm (odds ratio, high vs. low receptivity: 0.59 [0.40, 0.88]). Perceived SSB harm was inversely associated with SSB intake.ConclusionBeverage advertisement receptivity was associated with less perceived SSB harm and greater SSB consumption in this population. Policy strategies, including marketing restrictions or counter-marketing campaigns could potentially reduce SSB consumption and improve health.