학술논문
Non-Fusion Versus Fusion Surgery in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Trade-Offs in Outcomes Are Acceptable for the Patient and Family?
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Larson, A. Noelle; Marks, Michelle Claire; Gonzalez Sepulveda, Juan Marcos; Newton, Peter O.; Devlin, Vincent J.; Peat, Raquel; Tarver, Michelle E.; Babalola, Olufemi; Chen, Allen L.; Gebben, David; Cahill, Patrick; Shah, Suken; Samdani, Amer; Bachmann, Keith; Lonner, Baron; Buckland, Aaron; Alanay, Ahmet; Samdani, Amer; Jain, Amit; Lonner, Baron; Roye, Benjamin; Cho, Bob; Yaszay, Burt; Yilgor, Caglar; Hoernschmeyer, Dan; Hedequist, Daniel; Sucato, Daniel; Clements, David; Miyanji, Firoz; Shufflebarger, Harry; Flynn, Jack; Marc Mac-Thiong, Jean; Murphy, Josh; Pahys, Joshua; Bachmann, Keith; Neal, Kevin; Blakemore, Laurel; Haber, Lawrence; Lenke, Lawrence; Abel, Mark; Erickson, Mark; Glotzbecker, Michael; Kelly, Michael; Vitale, Michael; Marks, Michelle; Gupta, Munish; Fletcher, Nicholas; Larson, A. Noelle; Cahill, Patrick; Sponseller, Paul; Gabos, Peter; Newton, Peter; Sturm, Peter; Betz, Randal; Parent, Stefan; George, Stephen; Hwang, Steven; Shah, Suken; Garg, Sumeet; Errico, Tom; Upasani, Vidyadhar
Source
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Jan 03, 2024 106(1):2-9
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0021-9355
Abstract
BACKGROUND:: Vertebral body tethering and other non-fusion techniques for the treatment of pediatric idiopathic scoliosis are increasing in popularity. There is limited physician consensus on this topic as the result of a paucity of published data regarding which patients most benefit from non-fusion strategies. Thus, much of the decision-making is left to patients and parents, who must select a treatment based on their goals and values and the information available from health-care providers, the internet, and social media. We sought to understand patient and family preferences regarding the attributes of fusion versus non-fusion surgery that drive these choices. METHODS:: Patients and families were recruited from 7 pediatric spine centers and were asked to complete a survey-based choice experiment that had been jointly developed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate patient preferences. Choices between experimentally designed alternatives were analyzed to estimate the relative importance of outcomes and requirements associated with the choice options (attributes). The attributes included appearance, confidence in the planned correction, spinal motion, device failure, reoperation, and recovery period. The inclusion criteria were (1) an age of 10 to 21 years and (2) a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients who were considering, or who had already undergone, treatment with fusion or non-fusion surgery. Preference weights were estimated from the expected changes in choice given changes in the attributes. RESULTS:: A total of 344 respondents (124 patients, 92 parents, and 128 parent/patient dyads) completed the survey. One hundred and seventy-three patients were enrolled prior to surgery, and 171 were enrolled after surgery. Appearance and motion were found to be the most important drivers of choice. For the entire cohort, fusion was preferred over non-fusion. For patients who were considering surgery, the most important attributes were preservation of spinal motion and appearance. CONCLUSIONS:: Patients and families seeking treatment for idiopathic scoliosis value appearance and preservation of spinal motion and, to a lesser extent, reoperation rates when considering fusion versus non-fusion surgery.