학술논문
홍수조절 생태계 계정 도입을 위한 전국 단위 시범 평가
Pilot Evaluation for the Introduction of Ecosystem Accounting for Flood Control
Pilot Evaluation for the Introduction of Ecosystem Accounting for Flood Control
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
환경영향평가 / Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. Dec 31, 2023 32(6):488
Subject
Language
Korean
ISSN
1225-7184
Abstract
생태계서비스 계정은 생태계 공급 기능과 수요, 그리고 그 사이에서 발생하는 실제 서비스 흐름을 측정해야 한다. 흐름을 측정하기 위해서는 공급과 수요 관계를 정의해야 하며, 복잡한 연결 관계를 객관화 할 수 있는 방법론이 필요하다. 국내에서는 생태계서비스에 대한 연구가 다양하게 진행되어 왔으나, 생태계서비스 계정화에 관한 연구는 부족하다. 본 연구의 목적은 환경경제통합계정(SEEA)의 실험적 생태계계정(EEA)에서 연구된 EU 방법론을 적용하여 홍수조절 생태계서비스를 평가하고 이를 토대로 생태계 계정 도입 방안을 모색하는데 있다. 연구수행을 위해 생태계의 유출량 보유 잠재력, 홍수조절에 대한 사회·경제적 수요, 그리고 그 사이의 관계로부터 형성되는 실제 서비스 혜택 흐름을 공간 기반으로 모델링하고 정량화하였다. 홍수조절 생태계서비스 실제 흐름을 산정한 결과, 국내 전체 서비스량은 165,595ha로 산출되었으며 많은 부분이 농경지에 집중되고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후 국내 홍수조절 서비스 계정 정밀화 도입을 위해서는 토지피복도와 같은 핵심 공간자료가 지속해서 구축 관리되어야 하며, 국가, 지역, 유역 등 다양한 공간 범위에서 적용 가능한 입력자료 및 방법론에 대한 연구가 필요할 것으로 보인다.
Ecosystem service accounting must measure ecosystem supply functions, demand, and the actual service flows that occur between them. In order to measure flows, supply and demand relationships must be defined, and a methodology that can objectify complex connections is needed. Although various studies on ecosystem services have been conducted in Korea, but researches on accounting for ecosystem services are not enough. The purpose of this study is to evaluate flood control ecosystem services by applying the EU methodology studied in the Experimental Ecosystem Account (EEA) of System of Environmental Economy Account (SEEA) and explore ways to introduce ecosystem account. To conduct the study, the ecosystem’s runoff retention potential, social and economic demand for flood control, and actual service benefit flows formed from the relationships between them were modeled and quantified on a spatial basis. As a result of calculating the actual flow of flood control ecosystem services, the total domestic service amount was calculated to be 165,595 (ha), and it was confirmed that much of it was concentrated in agricultural land. In order to account for domestic flood control services in the future, key spatial data such as land cover maps must be continuously established and managed, and researches on input data and methodologies applicable to various spatial scopes such as national, regional, and unit watersheds are expected to be necessary.
Ecosystem service accounting must measure ecosystem supply functions, demand, and the actual service flows that occur between them. In order to measure flows, supply and demand relationships must be defined, and a methodology that can objectify complex connections is needed. Although various studies on ecosystem services have been conducted in Korea, but researches on accounting for ecosystem services are not enough. The purpose of this study is to evaluate flood control ecosystem services by applying the EU methodology studied in the Experimental Ecosystem Account (EEA) of System of Environmental Economy Account (SEEA) and explore ways to introduce ecosystem account. To conduct the study, the ecosystem’s runoff retention potential, social and economic demand for flood control, and actual service benefit flows formed from the relationships between them were modeled and quantified on a spatial basis. As a result of calculating the actual flow of flood control ecosystem services, the total domestic service amount was calculated to be 165,595 (ha), and it was confirmed that much of it was concentrated in agricultural land. In order to account for domestic flood control services in the future, key spatial data such as land cover maps must be continuously established and managed, and researches on input data and methodologies applicable to various spatial scopes such as national, regional, and unit watersheds are expected to be necessary.