학술논문

A transfer learning nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and benign conditions on MRI
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
BMC Medical Imaging. November 30, 2023, Vol. 23 Issue 1
Subject
Medical imaging equipment
Medical research
Prostate cancer
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medicine, Experimental
Language
English
ISSN
1471-2342
Abstract
Author(s): Junhao Chen[sup.1,2], Bao Feng[sup.2,3], Maoqing Hu[sup.2], Feidong Huang[sup.4], Yehang Chen[sup.3], Xilun Ma[sup.5] and Wansheng Long[sup.1,2,6] Background In men, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in 112 [...]
Background Deep learning has been used to detect or characterize prostate cancer (PCa) on medical images. The present study was designed to develop an integrated transfer learning nomogram (TLN) for the prediction of PCa and benign conditions (BCs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 709 patients with pathologically confirmed PCa and BCs from two institutions were included and divided into training (n = 309), internal validation (n = 200), and external validation (n = 200) cohorts. A transfer learning signature (TLS) that was pretrained with the whole slide images of PCa and fine-tuned on prebiopsy MRI images was constructed. A TLN that integrated the TLS, the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and the clinical factor was developed by multivariate logistic regression. The performance of the TLS, clinical model (CM), and TLN were evaluated in the validation cohorts using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Delong test, the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis. Results TLS, PI-RADS score, and age were selected for TLN construction. The TLN yielded areas under the curve of 0.9757 (95% CI, 0.9613-0.9902), 0.9255 (95% CI, 0.8873-0.9638), and 0.8766 (95% CI, 0.8267-0.9264) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively, for the discrimination of PCa and BCs. The TLN outperformed the TLS and the CM in both the internal and external validation cohorts. The decision curve showed that the TLN added more net benefit than the CM. Conclusions The proposed TLN has the potential to be used as a noninvasive tool for PCa and BCs differentiation. Keywords: Prostatic cancer, Deep learning, Transfer learning, Magnetic resonance imaging