학술논문
Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes
Document Type
Report
Author
Source
Critical Care. November 17, 2023, Vol. 27 Issue 1
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1364-8535
Abstract
Author(s): Sebastian Born[sup.1,2] , Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek[sup.1,2] , Wiltrud Abels[sup.3,4] , Silke Piedmont[sup.5,6] , Edmund Neugebauer[sup.5] , Konrad Reinhart[sup.3,4] , Evjenia Toubekis[sup.3] , Odette Wegwarth[sup.7,8] and Daniel Schwarzkopf[sup.9] Introduction Sepsis is [...]
Background Sepsis is a medical emergency with potentially life-threatening consequences. Patients play a crucial role in preventing and recognizing sepsis at an early stage. The understanding of risk groups' sepsis knowledge and their ability to use this knowledge to recognize sepsis as an emergency is incomplete. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany and included a sample of 740 persons stratified by age (< 60 years, [greater than or equal to] 60 years), specific chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes, chronic diseases, cancer), and region (Berlin/Brandenburg vs. other federal states of Germany). Standardized questionnaires were administered by a market research institute through online, telephone, or face-to-face methods. We assessed sepsis knowledge through a series of questions and the ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency through five case vignettes. To identify predictors of sepsis knowledge and the ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency, we conducted multiple linear regressions. Results Of the 36 items on sepsis knowledge, participants answered less than 50 per cent correctly (mean 44.1%; standard deviation (SD) 20.1). Most patients knew that sepsis is a defensive host response to infection (75.9%), but only 30.8% knew that vaccination can prevent infections that lead to sepsis. Across the five vignettes, participants identified sepsis as an emergency in only 1.33 of all cases on average (SD = 1.27). Sepsis knowledge was higher among participants who were older, female, and more highly educated and who reported more extensive health information seeking behaviour. The ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency was higher among younger participants, participants without chronic diseases, and participants with higher health literacy, but it was not significantly associated with sepsis knowledge. Conclusions Risk groups showed low levels of knowledge regarding the preventive importance of vaccination and a low ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency. Higher levels of sepsis knowledge alone were not sufficient to improve the ability to identify sepsis as a medical emergency. It is crucial to develop effective educational strategies--especially for persons with lower education levels and infrequent health information seeking behaviour--that not only transfer but also facilitate the choice of appropriate actions, such as seeking timely emergency care. Trial registration: DRKS00024561. Registered 9 March 2021. Keywords: Sepsis, Knowledge, Population at risk, Early diagnosis, Health literacy
Background Sepsis is a medical emergency with potentially life-threatening consequences. Patients play a crucial role in preventing and recognizing sepsis at an early stage. The understanding of risk groups' sepsis knowledge and their ability to use this knowledge to recognize sepsis as an emergency is incomplete. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany and included a sample of 740 persons stratified by age (< 60 years, [greater than or equal to] 60 years), specific chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes, chronic diseases, cancer), and region (Berlin/Brandenburg vs. other federal states of Germany). Standardized questionnaires were administered by a market research institute through online, telephone, or face-to-face methods. We assessed sepsis knowledge through a series of questions and the ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency through five case vignettes. To identify predictors of sepsis knowledge and the ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency, we conducted multiple linear regressions. Results Of the 36 items on sepsis knowledge, participants answered less than 50 per cent correctly (mean 44.1%; standard deviation (SD) 20.1). Most patients knew that sepsis is a defensive host response to infection (75.9%), but only 30.8% knew that vaccination can prevent infections that lead to sepsis. Across the five vignettes, participants identified sepsis as an emergency in only 1.33 of all cases on average (SD = 1.27). Sepsis knowledge was higher among participants who were older, female, and more highly educated and who reported more extensive health information seeking behaviour. The ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency was higher among younger participants, participants without chronic diseases, and participants with higher health literacy, but it was not significantly associated with sepsis knowledge. Conclusions Risk groups showed low levels of knowledge regarding the preventive importance of vaccination and a low ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency. Higher levels of sepsis knowledge alone were not sufficient to improve the ability to identify sepsis as a medical emergency. It is crucial to develop effective educational strategies--especially for persons with lower education levels and infrequent health information seeking behaviour--that not only transfer but also facilitate the choice of appropriate actions, such as seeking timely emergency care. Trial registration: DRKS00024561. Registered 9 March 2021. Keywords: Sepsis, Knowledge, Population at risk, Early diagnosis, Health literacy