학술논문

Implementation and evaluation of crowdsourcing in global health education
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Global Health Research and Policy. December 15, 2022, Vol. 7 Issue 1
Subject
Evaluation
Analysis
Medical personnel training -- Analysis
Health education -- Analysis
Teachers -- Analysis
Preventive medicine -- Analysis
Teaching models -- Analysis
World health -- Analysis
COVID-19 -- Analysis
Crowdsourcing -- Analysis
Medicine, Preventive -- Analysis
Medical personnel -- Training
Preventive health services -- Analysis
Learning -- Models
Language
English
Abstract
Author(s): Huanle Cai[sup.1], Huiqiong Zheng[sup.1], Jinghua Li[sup.1,2,3], Chun Hao[sup.1,2,3], Jing Gu[sup.1,2,3], Jing Liao[sup.1,2,3] and Yuantao Hao[sup.1,2,3,4] Background Global health has attracted wide attention worldwide in many fields [1]. Global health [...]
Background Current global health course is most set as elective course taught in traditional teacher-taught model with low credit and short term. Innovate teaching models are required. Crowdsourcing characterized by high flexibility and strong application-orientation holds its potential to enhance global health education. We applied crowdsourcing to global health teaching for undergraduates, aiming to develop and evaluate a new teaching model for global health education. Methods Crowdsourcing was implemented into traditional course-based teaching via introducing five COVID-19 related global health debates. Undergraduate students majoring in preventative medicine and nursing grouped in teams of 5-8, were asked to resolve these debates in reference to main content of the course and with manner they thought most effective to deliver the messages. Students' experience and teaching effect, were evaluated by questionnaires and teachers' ratings, respectively. McNemar's test was used to compare the difference in students' experience before and after the course, and regression models were used to explore the influencing factors of the teaching effect. Results A total of 172 undergraduates were included, of which 122 (71%) were females. Students' evaluation of the new teaching model improved after the course, but were polarized. Students' self-reported teaching effect averaged 67.53 [+ or -] 16.8 and the teachers' rating score averaged 90.84 [+ or -] 4.9. Students majoring in preventive medicine, participated in student union, spent more time on revision, and had positive feedback on the new teaching model tended to perform better. Conclusion We innovatively implemented crowdsourcing into global health teaching, and found this new teaching model was positively received by undergraduate students with improved teaching effects. More studies are needed to optimize the implementation of crowdsourcing alike new methods into global health education, to enrich global health teaching models. Keywords: Global health, Crowdsourcing, Teaching model, Effect evaluation