학술논문

A comparison of 8‐mm and open‐irrigated gold‐tip catheters for typical atrial flutter ablation: Data from a prospective multicenter registry
Document Type
Report
Source
Journal of Arrhythmia. August 2018, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p402, 8 p.
Subject
Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Atrial flutter -- Care and treatment
Ablation (Surgery) -- Comparative analysis
Language
English
ISSN
1880-4276
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is generally considered a first‐line therapy for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)‐dependent atrial flutter (AFL), due to its curative effect and low complication rate. Bidirectional CTI conduction [...]
: Background: Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is the standard treatment for patients suffering from CTI‐dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The aim of this study was to compare the use in clinical practice of 8‐mm gold‐tip catheter (8mmRFC) and open‐irrigated gold‐tip catheter (irrRFC) for RF typical AFL ablation. Methods: Patients with typical AFL were treated with 8mmRFC or irrRFC catheters according to investigator preferences. The primary endpoint was the cumulative radiofrequency time (CRFT). Fluoroscopy time, acute and 6‐month success rates were secondary endpoints. Results: After excluding 3 patients with left AFL, 157 of the enrolled patients (median age 71.8 [interquartile range, 64.1‐76.2], 76% men, 91% in NYHA class ≤II, 65% with no structural heart disease) were analyzed: 74 (47%) subjects were treated with the 8mmRFC and 83 (53%) with the irrRFC. The median CRFT was 3 [2‐6] minutes in the 8mmRFC group and 5 [3‐7] minutes in the irrRFC group (P =.183). There were no significant differences in ablation success rates, intraprocedural CTI reconnections, audible steam pops, and procedural times. In the 8mmRFC group, a significantly lower fluoroscopy time was observed as compared to the irrRFC group (8 [5‐12] vs 15 [10‐20] minutes, P Conclusions: The 8mmRFC and the irrRFC performed similarly in routine practice for CTI ablation in terms of cumulative RF time, acute and 6‐month success rates. Fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the 8mmRFC group.