부산대학교 도서관

Outcomes of surgical procedures are often reported in literature in a clinician-centered fashion. Classic surgical outcome papers primarily report on measures of efficacy, like remission rates and gross total resection. [...]
Context: Transsphenoidal surgery is standard care in the treatment of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Current clinician-reported surgical outcome measures are one-dimensional, typically focusing primarily on complete or partial resection, and secondarily on complication rates. However, outcomes are best reflected by the delicate balance of efficacy and complications at patient level. Objective: This study proposes a novel way to classify and report outcomes, integrating efficacy and safety at the patient level. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical procedures for acromegaly, Cushing's disease, and prolactinoma between 2010 and 2018 in a single tertiary referral center. We present our results in a classic (remission and complications separate) and in a novel outcome square integrating both outcomes, focusing on intended and adverse effects (long-term complications). This resulted in 4 outcome groups, ranging from good to poor. We use this approach to present these outcomes for several subgroups. Results: A total of 198 surgical procedures were included (44 reoperations). Remission was achieved in 127 operations (64%). Good outcome was observed after 121 (61%), and poor outcome after 6 (3%) operations. When intended effect of surgery was applied (instead of remission), good outcome as intended was achieved after 148 of 198 surgeries (75%) and poor outcome after 4 (2%). Conclusion: Quality of a surgical intervention can be presented in 4 simple categories, integrating both efficacy and safety with flexibility to adapt to the individualized situation at patient, disease, and surgical strategy and to the outcome of interest. Key Words: Pituitary adenoma, transsphenoidal surgery, outcomes, patient counselling