학술논문
Intrapulmonic Cavity or Necrosis on Baseline CT Scan Serves as an Efficacy Predictor of Anti-PD-(L)1 Inhibitor in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Source
Cancer Management and Research. July 31, 2021, Vol. 13, p5931, 9 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1179-1322
Abstract
Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed our approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. (1) A selection of biomarkers, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1,2-6) tumor mutational burden (TMB,7,8) [...]
Background: Predictive markers for guidance and monitoring of immunotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) are an interesting topic but have yet to be fully explored. A primary characteristic of LSCC is tumor necrosis that results in extensive immune suppression in patients. We sought to assess whether tumor necrosis or cavity on baseline CT could effectively predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced LSCC. Methods: Advanced LSCC cases undergoing pre-treatment chest CT imaging and receiving ICIs were retrospectively collected. All CT images were reviewed by an independent chest radiologist blinded to any previous diagnosis to confirm morphological alterations in necrosis or cavity. We performed Logistic regression and developed Cox proportional hazards models to assess the predictive performance of baseline necrosis or cavity characteristics in advanced LSCC. Survival estimates were observed using Kaplan--Meier curves. Results: Ninety-three patients were eligible for analysis, predominantly consisting of patients with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (97.8%), male patients (95.7%), and heavy smokers (92.5%). Intrapulmonic necrosis or cavity on CT scan was present in 52.7% of all patients. Generally, the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with necrosis or cavity to ICI treatment was significantly worse versus those without (30.6% vs 54.5%, p = 0.020), with the subgroup ORRs as follows: ICI monotherapy (necrosis vs non-necrosis: 10.0% vs 36.8%, p =0.047) and ICI combination therapy (44.8% vs 68.0%, p =0.088). Multivariable analysis identified intrapulmonic necrosis or cavity at baseline as a major risk factor for advanced LSCC (HR 4.042, 95% CI1.149-10.908, p = 0.006). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that baseline necrosis or cavity and ICI monotherapy were unfavorable factors for progression-free survival (HR 1.729; 95% CI1.203-2.484, p =0.003). Conclusion: LSCC patients with intrapulmonic cavity or necrosis on baseline CT scan may respond poorly to anti-PD-(L)1-treatment, monotherapy and combination therapy alike. Keywords: lung squamous cell carcinoma, immune-checkpoint inhibitor, predictive marker, necrosis, cavity
Background: Predictive markers for guidance and monitoring of immunotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) are an interesting topic but have yet to be fully explored. A primary characteristic of LSCC is tumor necrosis that results in extensive immune suppression in patients. We sought to assess whether tumor necrosis or cavity on baseline CT could effectively predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced LSCC. Methods: Advanced LSCC cases undergoing pre-treatment chest CT imaging and receiving ICIs were retrospectively collected. All CT images were reviewed by an independent chest radiologist blinded to any previous diagnosis to confirm morphological alterations in necrosis or cavity. We performed Logistic regression and developed Cox proportional hazards models to assess the predictive performance of baseline necrosis or cavity characteristics in advanced LSCC. Survival estimates were observed using Kaplan--Meier curves. Results: Ninety-three patients were eligible for analysis, predominantly consisting of patients with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (97.8%), male patients (95.7%), and heavy smokers (92.5%). Intrapulmonic necrosis or cavity on CT scan was present in 52.7% of all patients. Generally, the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with necrosis or cavity to ICI treatment was significantly worse versus those without (30.6% vs 54.5%, p = 0.020), with the subgroup ORRs as follows: ICI monotherapy (necrosis vs non-necrosis: 10.0% vs 36.8%, p =0.047) and ICI combination therapy (44.8% vs 68.0%, p =0.088). Multivariable analysis identified intrapulmonic necrosis or cavity at baseline as a major risk factor for advanced LSCC (HR 4.042, 95% CI1.149-10.908, p = 0.006). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that baseline necrosis or cavity and ICI monotherapy were unfavorable factors for progression-free survival (HR 1.729; 95% CI1.203-2.484, p =0.003). Conclusion: LSCC patients with intrapulmonic cavity or necrosis on baseline CT scan may respond poorly to anti-PD-(L)1-treatment, monotherapy and combination therapy alike. Keywords: lung squamous cell carcinoma, immune-checkpoint inhibitor, predictive marker, necrosis, cavity