학술논문
Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Irrigating Solutions on Endodontic Pathogens--An In Vivo Study
Original Research Article
Original Research Article
Document Type
Report
Source
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. March 15, 2021, Vol. 10 Issue 11, p789, 4 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2278-4748
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endodontic infections are polymicrobial in nature and pose a serious threat to the success of endodontic treatment. Complete intracanal and microbial disinfection has to be done before the three-dimensional [...]
BACKGROUND The key to a successful endodontic treatment is to ensure complete eradication of the infection present and to prevent reinfection. This depends on meticulous disinfection using intracanal irrigants. In dentistry the most commonly used irrigant is sodium hypochlorite which has the disadvantages of cytotoxicity and unpleasant taste. The extracts of neem have been used since ages for their medicinal values and used widely for health care. However, the potential use of such an agent for the success of endodontic procedures has not yet been investigated. Hence, if proved effective, such a natural agent will have a dominant hold against the chemical disinfectants in terms of biocompatibility and tissue response. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Q-MIX (2 in 1), 10 % neem (Azadirachta indica), and 2 % sodium hypochlorite on the growth and culture of Enterococcus faecalis and Mutant Streptococcus over a period of 4 weeks. METHODS This is a descriptive study conducted among samples collected from 30 healthy patients who were indicated for pulpectomy. The sample size was taken for convenience. Incisors of these individuals were selected on the basis that they had to undergo endodontic treatment due to primary endodontic infection. The zones of inhibition were measured by agar well diffusion method. Statistical analysis was done using independent T test & chi-square test. RESULTS Statistical analysis showed that the mean zones of inhibition in this study were 20.54 mm, 9.65 mm and 4.54 mm for Q-MIX (2 in 1), 10 % neem and 2 % sodium hypochlorite. The significance was greater between Q-MIX (2 in 1) and the other two agents as the P-value was < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS The result indicated Q-MIX (2 in 1) is a more effective root canal irrigant when compared to 10 % neem and 2 % sodium hypochlorite. KEY WORDS Q-MIX (2 in 1), Azadirachta indica, Apical Periodontitis, Enterococcus faecalis
BACKGROUND The key to a successful endodontic treatment is to ensure complete eradication of the infection present and to prevent reinfection. This depends on meticulous disinfection using intracanal irrigants. In dentistry the most commonly used irrigant is sodium hypochlorite which has the disadvantages of cytotoxicity and unpleasant taste. The extracts of neem have been used since ages for their medicinal values and used widely for health care. However, the potential use of such an agent for the success of endodontic procedures has not yet been investigated. Hence, if proved effective, such a natural agent will have a dominant hold against the chemical disinfectants in terms of biocompatibility and tissue response. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Q-MIX (2 in 1), 10 % neem (Azadirachta indica), and 2 % sodium hypochlorite on the growth and culture of Enterococcus faecalis and Mutant Streptococcus over a period of 4 weeks. METHODS This is a descriptive study conducted among samples collected from 30 healthy patients who were indicated for pulpectomy. The sample size was taken for convenience. Incisors of these individuals were selected on the basis that they had to undergo endodontic treatment due to primary endodontic infection. The zones of inhibition were measured by agar well diffusion method. Statistical analysis was done using independent T test & chi-square test. RESULTS Statistical analysis showed that the mean zones of inhibition in this study were 20.54 mm, 9.65 mm and 4.54 mm for Q-MIX (2 in 1), 10 % neem and 2 % sodium hypochlorite. The significance was greater between Q-MIX (2 in 1) and the other two agents as the P-value was < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS The result indicated Q-MIX (2 in 1) is a more effective root canal irrigant when compared to 10 % neem and 2 % sodium hypochlorite. KEY WORDS Q-MIX (2 in 1), Azadirachta indica, Apical Periodontitis, Enterococcus faecalis