학술논문

Origins of prehistoric flints: The neocortex memory revealed by scanning electron microscopy
Document Type
Report
Source
Comptes rendus - Palevol. Dec, 2007, Vol. 6 Issue 8, p557, 12 p.
Subject
Archaeology
Rocks
Electron microscopy
Erosion
Language
English
ISSN
1631-0683
Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2007.09.015 Byline: Paul Fernandes (a), Francois-Xavier Le Bourdonnec (b), Jean-Paul Raynal (a), Gerard Poupeau (b), Michel Piboule (c), Marie-Helene Moncel (d) Keywords: Flint; Neocortex; SEM; Middle Palaeolithic; Gathering outcrop; Haute-Loire; Ardeche; France Abstract: Flint has been widely used during prehistoric times and the question of determining the origin of specific pieces is recurrent in archaeological discussions. We have run a scanning electron microscope examination of the surfaces of both natural flints from geological deposits and flaked artefacts excavated from prehistoric sites in the Massif Central (France). These samples exhibit mineralogical textures resulting from genomorphic and phenomorphic processes, dispersed alteration in the form of erosion as well as the dissolution and migration of more or less mobile elements. Rocks used to manufacture artefacts at Sainte-Anne 1 (Haute-Loire, France) and Payre (Ardeche, France) show various kinds of alteration related to the range of phases of transport and deposition to which they were subjected, beginning with their first exposure in a geological context and following through to the post-depositional phase, (i.e., following abandonment as artefacts in an archaeological site). Later phenomena do not however completely obliterate stigma imprinted prior to their prehistoric collection, because the main late-phase change that occurs on flat surfaces prior to their collection is preserved in the hollows of remnant natural surfaces on archaeological tools. With the scanning electron microscope, five distinct morphologies representative of different environments have been characterised by establishing associations between the different forms and by plotting their regional distribution. Author Affiliation: (a) UMR 5199 PACEA, IPGQ, bAcentstiment de geologie B18, universite Bordeaux-1, avenue des Facultes, 33405 Talence cedex, France (b) CRP2A-IRAMAT, UMR 5060 CNRS-universite Bordeaux-3, maison de l'archeologie, esplanade des Antilles, 33607 Pessac, France (c) Institut Dolomieu, universite Joseph-Fourier (Grenoble-1), 15, rue Maurice-Gignoux, 38031 Grenoble, France (d) UMR 5198 CNRS, institut de paleontologie humaine, departement de prehistoire, Museum national d'histoire naturelle, 1, rue Rene-Panhard, 75013 Paris, France Article History: Received 12 May 2007; Accepted 18 September 2007