학술논문

Planning for Planet or City?
Document Type
TEXT
Source
Urban Planning, 1(1)
Urban Planning, 1 (1)
Subject
Städtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltung
Soziologie, Anthropologie
Siedlungssoziologie, Stadtsoziologie
Raumplanung und Regionalforschung
soziale Entwicklung
Stadtentwicklung
Stadtplanung
soziale Faktoren
Modell
Urbanisierung
Landscaping and area planning
Sociology & anthropology
future cities; urban forms; urban planning; urbanization
Area Development Planning, Regional Research
Sociology of Settlements and Housing, Urban Sociology
urbanization
model
social change
urban planning
social factors
urban development
Language
English
Abstract
If we now live with a planetary urban process (Brenner & Schmid, 2015a), the very idea of “future cities” must be brought into question. Indeed, we might ask whether urban planning has morphed into planetary planning, with its primary charge being the construction of vast networks of urban systems coordinating a global capitalist process. This commentary cautions against such over-extended theories of urbanization and related planning practices. Although global capitalism has engendered profound spatial changes, the concept of the city remains a crucial social and political idea. By outlining the continued centrality of the city to social and political life, the commentary argues for a democratic evaluation of the urban form in order to plan for, and realize, more just cities.