부산대학교 도서관

The goal of this paper is to clarify the meaning of Husserl's phenomenological criticism of ancient hedonism, especially Aristippus. Husserl focuses on Aristippus's doctrine that pleasure is good or values, and then argues with the hedonistic principle. According to Husserl, values should not identify with pleasure. Although pleasure as a non-intentional experience contributes to the formation of value-emotion, pleasure itself is not a goal of choice and behavior. Lastly, looking through Husserl's phenomenological theory of the intentional value apperception, I suggest that pleasure has an ambivalent meaning for Husserl's phenomenological ethics.