학술논문

Comparative Evaluation of Cone-Beam Consistency Conditions for Mono-Material Beam Hardening Correction in Flat Detector Computed Tomography
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, IEEE Transactions on. 7(4):354-371 Apr, 2023
Subject
Nuclear Engineering
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Bioengineering
Computing and Processing
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
Detectors
Three-dimensional displays
Computed tomography
Image reconstruction
Geometry
Transforms
Trajectory
Beam hardening correction
cone-beam computed tomography (CT)
consistency conditions
Language
ISSN
2469-7311
2469-7303
Abstract
Consistency conditions have been successfully utilized for data-driven artifact reductions in cone-beam computed tomography systems equipped with a large-area flat-panel detector. Recently, many formulations and applications of pairwise cone-beam consistency conditions have been published, including the Grangeat consistency condition (GCC), Smith consistency condition (SCC), and fan-beam consistency condition (FBCC). Previous works demonstrated that the polynomial coefficients for beam hardening correction could be directly computed from cone-beam raw data by enforcing consistency conditions on projection pairs. This article compares the effectiveness of pairwise consistency conditions for mono-material beam hardening correction using a second-degree polynomial. The results from our studies show that similar corrections could be achieved for ideal polychromatic projections. We also investigated the effectiveness of corrections after perturbing the projections with an increasing degree of errors other than those caused by beam hardening. The studies indicate the superior robustness of FBCCs toward Poisson noise, axial truncation, detector shift, and scatter, while GCCs were less vulnerable to projection intensity errors. The optimal choice of consistency conditions depends on the CBCT system geometry, physical phenomena other than beam hardening, and the availability and accuracy of preprocessing and artifact corrections algorithms before beam hardening correction.