학술논문

Bulk Defects and Hydrogenation Kinetics in Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells With Fired Passivating Contacts
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics IEEE J. Photovoltaics Photovoltaics, IEEE Journal of. 12(3):711-721 May, 2022
Subject
Photonics and Electrooptics
Passivation
Hydrogen
Temperature measurement
Silicon carbide
Kinetic theory
Silicon
Ions
Bulk defects
float-zone (FZ)
hydrogenation
kinetics
modulated photoluminescence (MPL)
passivating contacts
secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)
silicon solar cells
Language
ISSN
2156-3381
2156-3403
Abstract
In this article, the effect of the various processing steps during the fabrication of c-Si/SiO x /SiC x fired passivating contacts on the silicon bulk lifetime is studied, and the kinetics of defect deactivation by hydrogenation is investigated. It is found that the firing step at 800 °C induces shallow bulk defects in float-zone silicon wafers, which can subsequently be passivated with hydrogen provided by an a-SiN x :H/D reservoir layer upon annealing at 450 °C. Experimental results and numerical data treatment indicate a rapid passivation of the surface within less than 1 min, followed by a slower passivation of the shallow bulk defects. In situ lifetime measurements are consistent with a slow bulk lifetime improvement by showing similar lifetime evolutions for both p-type and n-type SiC x layers. The kinetics of the hydrogenation process seems to be limited by the available hydrogen supply at the c-Si/SiO x interface, rather than by its diffusion within the bulk of the wafer. Moreover, it is affected by the bulk doping as well as the SiC x layer thickness. Finally, it is shown that hydrogenation is also possible with an a-SiN x :H/D reservoir layer deposited on one side of the wafer only, although resulting in a lower passivation level (${{\boldsymbol{\tau }}_{\mathbf{eff}}}$ ∼700 μ s compared to ${{\boldsymbol{\tau }}_{\mathbf{eff}}}$ ∼1300 μ s for symmetrical samples), and slower kinetics (${{\boldsymbol{\tau }}_{\mathbf{reac}}}$ ∼5 min comparedto ${{\boldsymbol{\tau }}_{\mathbf{reac}}}$ ∼0.8 min).