학술논문

Operational Implementation of Sea Ice Concentration Estimates From the AMSR2 Sensor
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sensing Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of. 10(9):3904-3911 Sep, 2017
Subject
Geoscience
Signal Processing and Analysis
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Sea ice
Microwave radiometry
Microwave FET integrated circuits
Microwave integrated circuits
Microwave imaging
US Government agencies
AMSR2
Antarctic
Arctic
passive microwave
remote sensing
sea ice
Language
ISSN
1939-1404
2151-1535
Abstract
An operation implementation of a passive microwave sea ice concentration algorithm to support NOAA's operational mission is presented. The NASA team 2 algorithm, previously developed for the NASA advanced microwave scanning radiometer for the Earth observing system (AMSR-E) product suite, is adapted for operational use with the JAXA AMSR2 sensor through several enhancements. First, the algorithm is modified to process individual swaths and provide concentration from the most recent swaths instead of a 24-hour average. A latency (time since observation) field and a 24-hour concentration range (maximum–minimum) are included to provide indications of data timeliness and variability. Concentration from the Bootstrap algorithm is a secondary field to provide complementary sea ice information. A quality flag is implemented to provide information on interpolation, filtering, and other quality control steps. The AMSR2 concentration fields are compared with a different AMSR2 passive microwave product, and then validated via comparison with sea ice concentration from the Suomi visible and infrared imaging radiometer suite. This validation indicates the AMSR2 concentrations have a bias of 3.9% and an RMSE of 11.0% in the Arctic, and a bias of 4.45% and RMSE of 8.8% in the Antarctic. In most cases, the NOAA operational requirements for accuracy are met. However, in low-concentration regimes, such as during melt and near the ice edge, errors are higher because of the limitations of passive microwave sensors and the algorithm retrieval.