학술논문

ω-3脂肪酸對於接受同步性化學放射治療食道癌病人營養狀態之影響—前導型研究 / The Impact of ω-3 Fatty Acid on the Nutritional Status of Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy-pilot study
Document Type
Article
Source
臺灣膳食營養學雜誌 / Taiwan Journal of Dietetics. Vol. 15 Issue 2, p13-28. 16 p.
Subject
食道癌
營養不良
營養支持
體重流失
ω-3脂肪酸
esophageal cancer
malnutrition
nutritional support
weight loss
ω-3 fatty acids
Language
繁體中文
英文
ISSN
2523-1553
Abstract
Compared with other gastrointestinal cancers, 70% of patients who are newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer are malnourished. In addition, the mortality rate of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy would double if these patients experience weight loss of more than 10%. These findings indicate the importance of nutritional support in patients with esophageal cancer. Many studies have revealed that patients with cancer who are administered formulations containing ω-3 fatty acids (i.e., docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids) show positive improvements in cancer cachexia, potentially reversing or preventing its development/progression; this has a favorable impact on the nutritional status of these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of enteral nutrition enriched with ω-3 fatty acids on body composition and nutritional status. In this randomized trial, we recruited 10 patients with esophageal cancer who were randomly assigned to two groups. During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, one group received a formulation containing ω-3 fatty acids (experimental group), whereas the other group received a standard balanced formulation (control group). Changes in body weight, nutritional status, quality of life, and blood biochemical values were monitored. The results showed that the median body weight differences between the two groups (experimental group vs. control group) of -1.50 kg vs. -1.80 kg. The median differences in calf circumferences between the two groups of -0.50 cm vs. < 0.01 cm. The median differences in mid-arm circumference between the two groups were -1.00 cm vs. -1.30 cm. The median differences in albumin between the two groups were -0.20 mg/mL vs. -0.40 mg/mL. The median differences in hemoglobin between the two groups were -2.60 g/dL vs. -2.80 g/dL. The median differences in C-reactive protein (CRP) between the two groups were -0.12 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL. Our results revealed that the median weight, mid-arm circumference, albumin, and hemoglobin decreased less in the experimental group than in the control group, while the median CRP increased less in the experimental group than in the control group. This finding may be due to the small number of study participants. In future studies, further observations with a larger sample size are warranted to monitor changes in nutritional status and thus provide more nutritional support options for patients with cancer during treatment.

Online Access