학술논문

The Best Way to 'Ban' Critical Race Theory: Prohibiting Promotion Rather than Inclusion or Compulsion
Document Type
Reports - Descriptive
Source
American Enterprise Institute. 2021.
Subject
Race
Critical Theory
Controversial Issues (Course Content)
Racial Bias
Teaching Methods
Criticism
Classification
State Legislation
Parent Attitudes
Propaganda
Risk
Legislators
Political Attitudes
Kindergarten
Civil Rights Legislation
Federal Legislation
Educational Policy
Language
English
Abstract
In the first half of 2021, 26 states introduced--and 12 passed--bills colloquially labeled "critical race theory (CRT) bans." The bills introduced to date can be grouped into three categories: prohibitions against compulsion, against inclusion, and against promotion. The prohibition against promoting CRT, first introduced in the North Carolina legislature, strikes the best balance between addressing parents' concerns about indoctrination without posing any risk of substantive curriculum imposition. This report is an exercise in constructive criticism for lawmakers who intend to thoughtfully draft or revisit legislation addressing the state-sponsored racism of CRT pedagogy. The author begins by outlining three principles that animate this analysis. The author then provides some criticism of bills introduced to date, offers a typology for understanding the varieties of bills proposed, and argues for the most constructive path legislators could take.