학술논문

Combining phacoemulsification with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation to manage cataract and glaucoma.
Document Type
Article
Source
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. Aug2013, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p546-551. 6p. 5 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subject
*PHACOEMULSIFICATION
*CATARACT surgery
*LIGHT coagulation
*INTRAOCULAR pressure
*ASTIGMATISM
GLAUCOMA surgery
Language
ISSN
1442-6404
Abstract
Background To examine the outcome and complications of combined phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation as surgical management of cataract and glaucoma. Design Retrospective uncontrolled case series from the glaucoma unit, Western Eye Hospital, London, UK. Participants Sixty-three eyes from 59 patients with coexisting cataract and glaucoma. Methods Patients underwent routine phacoemulsification followed by 270-360 degree endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation as a single procedure. Main Outcome Measures Intraocular pressure, number of intraocular pressure-lowering medications, log MAR visual acuity, recorded complications. Results Baseline characteristics included mean age (77.3 ± 11.1 years), mean log MAR visual acuity (1.01 ± 0.98), mean intraocular pressure (21.13 ± 6.21 mmHg) and mean number of intraocular pressure-lowering medications, (2.71 ± 1.06). Twelve months after phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, mean intraocular pressure had reduced to 16.09 ± 5.27 mmHg ( P < 0.01), number of intraocular pressure-lowering medications reduced to 1.47 ± 1.30 ( P < 0.01) and mean log MAR acuity improved to 0.33 ± 0.22 ( P < 0.01). Success, defined as an intraocular pressure reduction > 20% with intraocular pressure 6-21 mmHg, was achieved in 55.5% of eyes at 12 months. Complications included fibrinous uveitis, elevated intraocular pressure, posterior vitreous detachment and induced astigmatism. Conclusion Phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation is both safe and effective as surgical management for cataract and glaucoma. Larger intraocular pressure reductions can be achieved in older patients and those with higher baseline intraocular pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]