학술논문

Leveraging opportunity of low carbon transition by super-emitter cities in China.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Zheng H; The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, London WC1H 0QB, UK.; Zhang Z; State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.; Dietzenbacher E; Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, Netherlands.; Zhou Y; Key Laboratory of City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development, Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.; Többen J; Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung mbH, Osnabrck 49080, Germany; Social Metabolism and Impacts, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam 14412, Germany.; Feng K; Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park MD 20742, USA.; Moran D; The Climate and Environmental Research Institute NILU, Lillestrøm 2007, Norway; Industrial Ecology Programme, Department of Energy and Process Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7010, Norway.; Jiang M; Industrial Ecology Programme, Department of Energy and Process Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7010, Norway.; Shan Y; School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Electronic address: y.shan@bham.ac.uk.; Wang D; Department of Geography, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK.; Liu X; Research and Promotion Center for Green and Low-carbon Development, Environmental Development Center of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100029, China.; Li L; School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.; Zhao D; Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.; Meng J; The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, London WC1H 0QB, UK. Electronic address: jing.j.meng@ucl.ac.uk.; Ou J; Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, Netherlands.; Guan D; The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, London WC1H 0QB, UK; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Source
Publisher: Elsevier B.V. Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 101655530 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2095-9281 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20959273 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Bull (Beijing) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE; MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Chinese cities are core in the national carbon mitigation and largely affect global decarbonisation initiatives, yet disparities between cities challenge country-wide progress. Low-carbon transition should preferably lead to a convergence of both equity and mitigation targets among cities. Inter-city supply chains that link the production and consumption of cities are a factor in shaping inequality and mitigation but less considered aggregately. Here, we modelled supply chains of 309 Chinese cities for 2012 to quantify carbon footprint inequality, as well as explored a leverage opportunity to achieve an inclusive low-carbon transition. We revealed significant carbon inequalities: the 10 richest cities in China have per capita carbon footprints comparable to the US level, while half of the Chinese cities sit below the global average. Inter-city supply chains in China, which are associated with 80% of carbon emissions, imply substantial carbon leakage risks and also contribute to socioeconomic disparities. However, the significant carbon inequality implies a leveraging opportunity that substantial mitigation can be achieved by 32 super-emitting cities. If the super-emitting cities adopt their differentiated mitigation pathway based on affluence, industrial structure, and role of supply chains, up to 1.4 Gt carbon quota can be created, raising 30% of the projected carbon quota to carbon peak. The additional carbon quota allows the average living standard of the other 60% of Chinese people to reach an upper-middle-income level, highlighting collaborative mechanism at the city level has a great potential to lead to a convergence of both equity and mitigation targets.
(Copyright © 2023 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)