학술논문
Receipt of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Outpatient Settings in a National Sample of Privately Insured Patients With Mood Disorders.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Source
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9808943 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1533-4112 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10950680 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J ECT Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Purpose: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), an effective treatment for bipolar and major depressive disorder, is underused. Little information is available on use of ECT in potentially less costly outpatient settings, possibly reducing cost barriers.
Methods: Insurance claims from the 2008 to 2017 MarketScan Commercial Database for patients diagnosed with mood disorders were used to compare 4 groups of ECT users in each year: those receiving (1) exclusively outpatient ECT, (2) first inpatient and subsequently outpatient, (3) outpatient and subsequently inpatient, and (4) exclusively inpatient ECT. Groups were compared on the proportion receiving ECT in each group over time as well as on the total numbers of treatments received along with group differences in sociodemographic and diagnostic characteristics and health care costs.
Results: Among 2.9 million patients diagnosed with mood disorders, the proportion who received ECT (n = 8859) was small (0.30%) and declined over the decade to 0.17%. Among those who received ECT, most did so exclusively as outpatients (52.3%), the group with fewest comorbidities and lowest costs. This proportion increased by 19.7% over the decade, whereas the proportion receiving ECT exclusively in an inpatient setting (12.1%) fell by 30.6%. The total number of treatments per patient averaged 11.7 per year and increased by 28.0% over the decade, with outpatients decreasing to slightly less than average. Health care costs were greatest for those who started ECT as inpatients.
Conclusions: Although the proportion of privately insured patients receiving ECT in outpatient settings has increased, reducing cost barriers, the use of ECT continued to be extremely limited and declining.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Methods: Insurance claims from the 2008 to 2017 MarketScan Commercial Database for patients diagnosed with mood disorders were used to compare 4 groups of ECT users in each year: those receiving (1) exclusively outpatient ECT, (2) first inpatient and subsequently outpatient, (3) outpatient and subsequently inpatient, and (4) exclusively inpatient ECT. Groups were compared on the proportion receiving ECT in each group over time as well as on the total numbers of treatments received along with group differences in sociodemographic and diagnostic characteristics and health care costs.
Results: Among 2.9 million patients diagnosed with mood disorders, the proportion who received ECT (n = 8859) was small (0.30%) and declined over the decade to 0.17%. Among those who received ECT, most did so exclusively as outpatients (52.3%), the group with fewest comorbidities and lowest costs. This proportion increased by 19.7% over the decade, whereas the proportion receiving ECT exclusively in an inpatient setting (12.1%) fell by 30.6%. The total number of treatments per patient averaged 11.7 per year and increased by 28.0% over the decade, with outpatients decreasing to slightly less than average. Health care costs were greatest for those who started ECT as inpatients.
Conclusions: Although the proportion of privately insured patients receiving ECT in outpatient settings has increased, reducing cost barriers, the use of ECT continued to be extremely limited and declining.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)