학술논문

Health state utility estimates for value assessments of novel treatments in Huntington's disease: a systematic literature review.
Document Type
Article
Source
Health & Quality of Life Outcomes. 4/16/2024, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-15. 15p.
Subject
*HUNTINGTON disease
*QUALITY of life
*NEURODEGENERATION
*DISEASE progression
*PATIENTS' families
Language
ISSN
1477-7525
Abstract
Background: Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a devastating impact on patients and their families. Quantifying how treatments affect patient outcomes is critical for informing reimbursement decisions. Many countries mandate a formal value assessment in which the treatment benefit is measured as quality-adjusted life-years, calculated with the use of utility estimates that reflect respondents' preferences for health states. Objective: To summarize published health state utility data in HD and identify gaps and uncertainties in the data available that could be used to inform value assessments. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of studies that used preference-based instruments (e.g., EQ-5D and SF-6D) to estimate utility values for people with HD. The studies were published between January 2012 and December 2022. Results: Of 383 articles screened, 16 articles reported utility values estimated in 11 distinct studies. The utility measure most frequently reported was EQ-5D (9/11 studies). Two studies reported SF-6D data; one used time trade-off methods to value health state descriptions (vignettes). Although utility scores generally worsened to a lower value with increased HD severity, the estimates varied considerably across studies. The EQ-5D index range was 0.89 − 0.72 for mild/prodromal HD and 0.71 − 0.37 for severe/late-stage disease. Conclusions: This study uncovered high variability in published utility estimates, indicating substantial uncertainty in existing data. Further research is needed to better understand preferences and valuation across all stages and domains of HD symptoms and the degree to which generic utility measures capture the impact of cognitive changes on quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]