학술논문

Cognitive outcomes in Susac syndrome: A 2‐year neuropsychological follow‐up study.
Document Type
Article
Source
European Journal of Neurology. Apr2024, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1-11. 11p.
Subject
*EXECUTIVE function
*SENSORINEURAL hearing loss
*NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL tests
*COGNITIVE ability
*NEUROLOGICAL disorders
*WORD recognition
*NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL rehabilitation
*RETINAL artery occlusion
*RETINAL vein occlusion
Language
ISSN
1351-5101
Abstract
Background and purpose: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare, autoimmune, neurological disease characterized by a clinical triad of branch retinal artery occlusion, sensorineural hearing loss and encephalopathy. Neuropsychological functioning in SuS is little researched and the prevalence, nature, and evolution over time of cognitive deficits in SuS remain unclear. This study aimed to better understand the long‐term neuropsychological outcomes of patients with SuS. Methods: Thirteen patients with SuS (mean [SD] age 39.5 [11.1] years) were enrolled at the Ghent University Hospital by their treating neurologist. The cognitive functioning and emotional well‐being of each patient was evaluated by means of a thorough neuropsychological test battery at baseline and after 2 years. Follow‐up testing after 2 years was performed in 11 patients (mean [SD] age 42.2 [11.5] years). Results: Patients showed normal neuropsychological test results at a group level, both at baseline and follow‐up testing. Significant improvements over time were found for information processing speed, verbal recognition, and semantic and phonological fluency. Individual test results showed interindividual variability at baseline, with most impairments being in attention, executive functioning and language, which improved after a 2‐year period. In addition, patients reported significantly lower mental and physical well‐being, both at baseline and follow‐up testing. Conclusions: Our results suggest that neuropsychological dysfunction in SuS is limited at a group level and improves over time. Nonetheless, individual test results reveal interindividual variability, making cognitive screening essential. Furthermore, a high psycho‐emotional burden of the disease was reported, for which screening and follow‐up are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]