학술논문

Association of Timely Comprehensive Genomic Profiling With Precision Oncology Treatment Use and Patient Outcomes in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Document Type
Article
Source
JCO Precision Oncology. 3/7/2024, Vol. 8, p1-11. 11p.
Subject
*NON-small-cell lung carcinoma
*IMMUNE checkpoint inhibitors
Language
ISSN
2473-4284
Abstract
PURPOSE: Timely biomarker testing remains out of reach for many patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Here, we studied the quality-of-care implications of closing the gap in timely receipt of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to inform first-line (1L) decisions. METHODS: Using a real-world clinicogenomic database, we studied testing and 1L treatment patterns in aNSCLC after the approval of pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin (May 10, 2017). To estimate the association of timely CGP results with therapy selection and patient outcomes, we identified patients with no previous genomic testing beyond PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and dichotomized patients by whether CGP results were available before or after 1L therapy initiation. RESULTS: In total, 2,694 patients were included in the 1L therapy decision impact assessment. Timely CGP increased matched targeted therapy use by 14 percentage points (17% with CGP v 2.8% without) and precision immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) use by 14 percentage points (18% with CGP v 3.9% without). Receipt of timely CGP resulted in an estimated 31 percentage point decrease in ICPI use among ALK/EGFR/RET/ROS1 -positive patients at an expected per-patient reduction in ineffective ICPI therapy cost of $13,659.37 with timely CGP to inform 1L treatment selection. Patient benefit of CGP extended to real-world time to therapy discontinuation (median time to therapy discontinuation: 3.9 v 10 months [hazard ratio, HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.70]; P = 1.9E-06; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67]; P = 2.0E-06) in 1L driver-positive patients. This effect was not significant for real-world overall survival (median overall survival: 32 v 29 months [HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.67]; P =.33; aHR, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.99]; P =.12). CONCLUSION: Timely CGP is associated with the quality of patient care as measured by 1L matched targeted therapy use, time to therapy discontinuation, and avoidance of ineffective, costly ICPIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]